Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Know your rotation speed
A typical trainer rotates in the mid-50s of knots - a 172 at around 55 KIAS, climbing out at a Vy in the low 70s, though check your own POH rather than memorising Cessna's numbers - and the transferable rule is that Vr sits just above the stall speed in takeoff configuration. Rotate early because "it felt ready" and the aircraft lifts off inside ground effect, where induced drag is reduced, then climbs out of it into more drag. On a marginal-performance day the result is an aircraft that lifts off and then refuses to climb, sagging back towards the runway.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 21 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,744 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,744 m of the 3,811 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 124 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, this aircraft landing had a score of 91.8%, indicating a high level of proficiency and skill during the approach and landing phases. The approach phase was particularly impressive, with excellent glideslope alignment and speed well above target, showing a strong ability to maintain control and precision.
Moving on to the landing phase, there were some areas for improvement. While the threshold height was good, the landing flare was noted as very poor. This suggests that there may have been some challenges in controlling the descent rate and angle right before touchdown. However, with practice and focus on this aspect, improvement is definitely achievable.
In the touchdown phase, there were a few issues noted. The touchdown rate was reported as very heavy, indicating a harder impact than desired. Additionally, the speed was slightly above target and the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone was not optimal. These factors suggest a need for better control and adjustment during the final moments of the landing process.
Lastly, in the rollout phase, the runway alignment was slightly off, with a distance of 3.8 m from the centerline. This deviation could be attributed to factors such as wind conditions or adjustments made during the landing, but it is essential to strive for better alignment to ensure a smooth and safe rollout.
Overall, while this landing had some areas for improvement, the high score of 91.8% is a testament to the overall competence and proficiency of the pilot. With continued practice, focus, and attention to detail, there is great potential to further enhance skills and achieve even greater success in future landings. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in every phase of the landing process.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values