Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Fly the descent profile
Enroute Descent scored 98.86 % — g force 0.55 to 1.30 g at 89 % was the weak point. Fixed, this flight scores 99.88 %.
Start to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks at 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,801 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,801 m of the 2,901 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 437 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, the RJ85 aircraft began its journey on runway 24L, taking off with a distance of 1,230 meters, which accounted for 41% of the runway. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 136 knots, with a local temperature of 22 degrees Celsius and a gentle wind of 2 knots at 19 degrees.
As the aircraft climbed out of Cleveland, it began its enroute climb, reaching an altitude of 32,961 feet in 28 minutes, covering a distance of 192 nautical miles. The climb was steady, with the aircraft reaching its cruising altitude in a relatively short period. Following the climb, the aircraft entered a brief level cruise, lasting 5 minutes and covering 42 nautical miles, before beginning its descent. The descent started over the Haunstein Ultralightport Shermans Dale in Pennsylvania, with the aircraft losing 25,961 feet in 14 minutes, covering 97 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered another brief level cruise, lasting 2 minutes and covering 8 nautical miles, before continuing its descent.
The final approach to runway 27R at Philadelphia International Airport was made from the east, with the aircraft descending from 7,002 feet to 1,176 feet in 6 minutes, covering 23 nautical miles. The landing was smooth, with the aircraft touching down at a speed of 105 knots and a touchdown rate of -167 feet per minute. The total landing distance was 1,717 meters, accounting for 59% of the runway. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, taking 4 minutes to cover 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 371 nautical miles, with a total fuel consumption of 2,221 kilograms and a flight duration of 69 minutes.
The aircraft, an RJ85, successfully executed a final approach to runway 27R at KPHL Philadelphia International Airport from the east, aligning with the heading of 255.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,155 feet above ground level. The approach quality was excellent, with a good threshold height and a threshold speed of 117 knots, well within the acceptable range. As the aircraft touched down on the runway, it demonstrated a good touchdown distance of 435 meters, and a touchdown speed of 105 knots, which was also within the desired parameters. The touchdown rate of -167 feet per minute was satisfactory, indicating a controlled descent.
The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with the aircraft centered on the runway centerline. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 28°C and a light wind of 2 knots from 210°, contributed to a smooth and stable approach. The crosswind and headwind components were minimal, at 2 knots each, further facilitating a precise touchdown. The aircraft's performance was impressive, with a total landing distance of 1,717 meters, which represented 59% of the runway length. This efficient use of the runway was a testament to the crew's skill and the aircraft's capabilities.
The rollout phase was equally impressive, with the aircraft maintaining perfect alignment with the runway centerline. The crew's ability to control the aircraft's speed and direction during the rollout phase ensured a safe and efficient exit from the runway. Overall, the landing was a success, with a score of 99.9% reflecting the crew's exceptional performance and the aircraft's reliable operation. The landing was a credit to the crew's training and experience, as well as the aircraft's design and maintenance.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values