Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach angle
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 28 stages, 27 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,393 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,393 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 454 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, an aircraft landing score of 83.8% is a good achievement, showing competence in various aspects of the landing process. While there were some areas that could be improved upon, it's important to recognize the strengths and also identify areas for growth.
In the Approach Phase, the poor descent path above the glideslope limit is something that can be worked on to ensure more precision in the descent towards the runway. By practicing and potentially receiving additional training, the descent path can be improved to meet the necessary requirements for a smoother landing.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's encouraging to see that the landing flare was very good, indicating a good control of the aircraft during the crucial moments before touchdown. However, the threshold height being above target is something that can be adjusted by paying closer attention to altitude during approach and landing.
In the Touchdown Phase, the smooth touchdown rate and on-target speed are positive indicators of proficiency. The touchdown point being 80m beyond the touchdown zone is a minor issue that can be addressed with more practice and focus on precision during landing. It's also important to note the runway touchdown position being slightly off-center, which can be improved to ensure proper alignment with the runway.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 18.4m from the centerline is an area that can be improved through better control and coordination during the rollout process. By refining techniques and focusing on maintaining alignment with the centerline, this aspect of the landing can be enhanced.
Overall, this landing score demonstrates a solid performance with room for improvement. By acknowledging both the strengths and areas for growth, there is an opportunity to continue honing skills and striving for even better scores in future landings. Keep up the good work and keep working towards achieving excellence in all phases of the landing process. Your commitment to improvement will surely lead to even better results in the future.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values