Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Monitor your taxi speed
Twenty knots on a monitor produces the visual sensation of about ten. The advice to "taxi at a walking pace" cannot fix this, because your sense of walking pace is exactly the thing that's broken. Put the groundspeed readout in your scan and obey it for the next fifty flights, the way a student pilot leans on the airspeed indicator before learning to read attitude.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 152 m above the runway. The 305 m gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,447 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 537 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Airbus A320 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Naples International Airport, taking 7 minutes and covering a distance of 4 nautical miles. The departure roll took place on runway 24, with a takeoff distance of 1,444 meters, which accounted for 71% of the runway. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 152 knots.
As the flight progressed, it encountered local weather conditions of 12°C temperature and a wind speed of 4 knots at 270°. The crosswind was 2 knots, while the headwind was 3 knots. The enroute climb started overhead Vicaria, Campania, Italy, where the aircraft climbed from an altitude of 379 meters above sea level to 9,971 meters above sea level, an increase of 9,592.7 meters, in 16 minutes and covering a distance of 59 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began 1 mile northwest of Boville Ernica, Lazio, Italy, and lasted for 25 minutes, covering a distance of 184 nautical miles. The enroute descent started 1 mile east of San Marcello Pistoiese, Toscana, Italy, where the aircraft descended from 10,037 meters above sea level to 485 meters above sea level, a decrease of 9,552.2 meters, in 20 minutes and covering a distance of 103 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 36 at Milano Linate Airport was made from the south, heading 356.0° at 4 nautical miles and 376.3 meters above ground level. The landing took place on runway 36, which had a length of 2,447 meters. The threshold height was slightly above the target, but the threshold speed was good at 138 knots. The touchdown point was 109 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 137 knots, which was a little fast. The touchdown rate was fair at -1.5 meters per second.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.1 meters from the centreline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 6°C temperature and a wind speed of 5 knots at 57°. The crosswind was 5 knots, while the headwind was 2 knots. The total landing distance was 891 meters, which accounted for 36% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 7.7 meters from the centreline.
The flight concluded with the aircraft taxiing to the parking area from the runway, taking 2 minutes and covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 355 nautical miles, taking 71 minutes, and the aircraft used 2,422 kilograms of fuel.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at Milano Linate Airport, achieving a score of 93.5%. The aircraft was approaching the runway from the south, heading 356.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 376.3 meters above ground level (agl). The landing was conducted on runway 36, which has a length of 2,447 meters.
Upon reaching the threshold, the aircraft's height was slightly above the target, indicating a minor deviation from the ideal approach path. However, the threshold speed was satisfactory at 138 knots, demonstrating good control and management of the aircraft's descent. The touchdown point was located 109 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which may indicate a slight overestimation of the aircraft's landing distance.
The touchdown speed of 137 knots was slightly faster than the ideal speed, which could have contributed to a slightly higher touchdown rate of -1.5 meters per second. This rate is considered fair, but it may have resulted in a slightly longer landing distance. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.1 meters from the centerline, which could have affected the aircraft's stability during the landing roll.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 6°C and a wind speed of 5 knots from a direction of 57°. The crosswind component was 5 knots, while the headwind component was 2 knots. These conditions were relatively calm, which may have contributed to the successful landing.
The total landing distance was 891 meters, which accounts for 36% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating good control and management of the aircraft's descent. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 7.7 meters from the centerline, which may have resulted in a slightly longer rollout distance.
Overall, the Airbus A320's landing at Milano Linate Airport was successful, with a score of 93.5%. While there were some minor deviations from the ideal approach path and landing parameters, the aircraft's performance was generally satisfactory, and the landing was conducted safely and efficiently.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values