Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Roll the wings level with aileron and hold bank within limits as you establish the climb.
What happened: Bank increased to 3.6° during the initial climb, and wings stayed over-banked at 6.3° into the next climb segment.
Watch for: Attitude indicator bank angle, aiming to keep it near wings-level
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: wings not level.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,810 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 351 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took approximately 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-900, then departed from runway 07 at SAWH Malvinas Argentinas Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,265 meters, which accounted for 52% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 158 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 11 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 18 knots at 227 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 11 knots and a tailwind of 14 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile east of SAWH Malvinas Argentinas Airport, and climbed from an altitude of 964 feet above sea level to 36,533 feet above sea level, an increase of 35,569 feet, in 35 minutes and covering 305 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise phase began at a latitude of -50.2522622 and a longitude of -65.1053562, and lasted for 120 minutes, covering 834 nautical miles. The aircraft then started its enroute descent, beginning 14 miles north of SAZT Héroes De Malvinas Airport Tandil, and descended from 36,479 feet above sea level to 1,397 feet above sea level, a decrease of 35,082 feet, in 20 minutes and covering 134 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 35 at SAEZ Minister Pistarini International Airport was made from the south, heading 343.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,320 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 35 was successful, with a touchdown distance of 351 meters, which was 30% of the runway length. The touchdown speed was 124 knots, and the touchdown rate was fair at -204 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the runway rollout alignment was also perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 22 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 4 knots at 300 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 2 knots and a headwind of 3 knots. The total landing distance was 839 meters, and the taxiing to the parking from the runway took approximately 2 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,280 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 165 minutes. The aircraft used 7,419 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-900 aircraft successfully landed at SAEZ Minister Pistarini International Airport, achieving a high score of 99.8%. The final approach to runway 35 was conducted from the south, with a heading of 343.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,320 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft touched down on the runway with a good threshold height, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. The threshold speed of 132 knots was also within the acceptable range, demonstrating the pilot's ability to manage the aircraft's speed during the landing phase. The touchdown distance of 351 meters was also satisfactory, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled approach.
The touchdown speed of 124 knots was within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate of -204 feet per minute (fpm) was fair, suggesting that the aircraft could have maintained a slightly more stable descent. However, this did not significantly impact the overall performance of the landing.
The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was aligned with the centerline of the runway at the moment of touchdown. This is a critical aspect of landing, as it ensures that the aircraft is properly positioned for rollout and reduces the risk of veering off the runway.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 22°C and a wind speed of 4 knots from 300°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, and the headwind component was 3 knots, which helped to stabilize the aircraft during the approach.
The total landing distance of 839 meters was 30% of the runway length, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled rollout. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, demonstrating that the pilot was able to maintain control of the aircraft during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score of 99.8%. The pilot's ability to manage the aircraft's speed, altitude, and alignment during the approach and rollout phases was evident, and the favorable weather conditions contributed to a smooth and controlled landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values