Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 23 ft off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 11 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 11 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 11 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 5,178 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,178 ft of the 7,996 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 1,975 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 11 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-900, then departed from runway 18C at the Cincinnati Northern Kentucky International Airport (KCVG). The takeoff distance was 4,761 feet, which was 43% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 158 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were a temperature of 40°F and a wind speed of 7 knots from a direction of 167°. This resulted in a crosswind of 2 knots and a headwind of 7 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile south of the airport and climbing from an altitude of 1,905 feet above sea level to 33,512 feet above sea level, an increase of 31,607 feet in 19 minutes and covering a distance of 104 nautical miles.
After reaching the desired altitude, the aircraft entered a level cruise, starting 1 mile northeast of Jamestown, Indiana. This cruise phase lasted for 49 minutes and covered a distance of 347 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 2 miles northwest of Osseo, Wisconsin. The descent from 33,994 feet above sea level to 11,813 feet above sea level, a decrease of 22,182 feet in 12 minutes and covering a distance of 73 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, this time starting overhead Cottage Grove, Minnesota, and lasting for 2 minutes, covering a distance of 7 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent, starting 2 miles east of Vermillion, Minnesota. The descent from 11,648 feet above sea level to 2,096 feet above sea level, a decrease of 9,553 feet in 8 minutes and covering a distance of 15 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 35 at the Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport (KMSP) was made from the south, heading 350.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,246 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 35, which had a length of 7,996 feet. The threshold height at 66 feet above ground level was above the target, and the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 149 knots.
The touchdown point was 568 feet beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was 145 knots, which was a little fast. However, the touchdown rate was good at -166 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 21°F and a wind speed of 11 knots from a direction of 355°, resulting in a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 11 knots.
The total landing distance was 4,871 feet, which was 61% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 10 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 556 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 113 minutes. The aircraft used 11,283 pounds of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-900 aircraft successfully landed at Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport (KMSP) on runway 35. The final approach was initiated from the south, heading 350.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,246 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's performance during the landing was evaluated, and it scored 90.6%.
The aircraft's approach to the runway was satisfactory, with the threshold height being above the target at 66 feet agl. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 149 knots. This minor deviation from the target speed did not significantly impact the overall landing performance.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft landed 568 feet beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively safe distance. The touchdown speed of 145 knots was a little fast, but the touchdown rate of -166 feet per minute (fpm) was good, indicating a controlled descent. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, demonstrating the pilot's skill and precision.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 21°F and a wind speed of 11 knots from 355°. This resulted in a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 11 knots, which the aircraft successfully managed during the landing.
The total landing distance of 4,871 feet was 61% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing distance. The runway rollout alignment was very good, demonstrating the pilot's ability to maintain control of the aircraft during the rollout phase.
Overall, the Boeing 737-900 aircraft performed well during the landing at KMSP, with a score of 90.6%. The minor deviations from the target speed and touchdown point were not significant enough to impact the overall performance, and the pilot's skill and precision were evident throughout the landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values