Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 152 m above the runway. The 305 m gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,402 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 202 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Airbus A320 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at EDDG Münster Osnabrück Airport, a process that took 5 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 25, with a takeoff distance of 1,352 meters, which accounted for 69% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 152 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of the airport, it began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile west of EDDG Münster Osnabrück Airport. The climb took 10 minutes, during which the aircraft ascended from 363 meters above sea level to 7,007 meters above sea level, an increase of 6,644.1 meters. The climb covered a distance of 54 nautical miles.
After reaching the desired altitude, the aircraft entered a level cruise, starting overhead Plettenberg, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany. This phase of the flight lasted 23 minutes and covered 157 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its enroute descent, starting 1 mile south east of Neubulach, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. The descent took 15 minutes, during which the aircraft descended from 7,008 meters above sea level to 1,618 meters above sea level, a decrease of 5,390.2 meters. The descent covered a distance of 72 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise, starting 1 mile east of Kirchhaslach, Bavaria, Germany. This phase of the flight lasted only 2 minutes and covered 5 nautical miles.
As the aircraft continued its descent, it began its final approach to runway 24 at EDJA Memmingen Allgau Airport, approaching from the north east. The aircraft was at an altitude of 380.5 meters above ground level and was 4 nautical miles from the runway.
The aircraft landed on runway 24, which had a length of 2,402 meters. The touchdown distance was 201 meters, and the touchdown speed was 131 knots, both of which were considered good. The touchdown rate was firm at -1.6 meters per second. However, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 13.9 meters from the centerline.
After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 300 nautical miles, and the flight took 65 minutes. The aircraft used 2,426 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at EDJA Memmingen Allgau Airport, achieving a score of 92.4%. The aircraft approached the runway from the north east, heading 239.0° at an altitude of 380.5 meters above ground level (agl) and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway.
The final approach was executed smoothly, with the aircraft touching down on runway 24 at a speed of 134 knots, which was within the acceptable threshold speed. The touchdown distance of 201 meters was also within the expected range, indicating a well-controlled descent. The touchdown speed of 131 knots was also satisfactory, and the touchdown rate of -1.6 meters per second was firm, suggesting a stable and controlled landing.
However, there were some minor issues with the landing. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 13.9 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's approach path. Additionally, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 13.4 meters from the centerline, which may have been caused by a slight drift in the aircraft's direction during the rollout.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were mild, with a temperature of 13°C. This suggests that the landing was not affected by any adverse weather conditions, and the aircraft's performance was not compromised by temperature-related factors.
Overall, the landing was successful, and the aircraft's performance was satisfactory. However, the minor issues with alignment during the touchdown and rollout phases may indicate a need for further refinement in the aircraft's approach and landing procedures.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values