Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Know your rotation speed
A typical trainer rotates in the mid-50s of knots - a 172 at around 55 KIAS, climbing out at a Vy in the low 70s, though check your own POH rather than memorising Cessna's numbers - and the transferable rule is that Vr sits just above the stall speed in takeoff configuration. Rotate early because "it felt ready" and the aircraft lifts off inside ground effect, where induced drag is reduced, then climbs out of it into more drag. On a marginal-performance day the result is an aircraft that lifts off and then refuses to climb, sagging back towards the runway.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 22 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,747 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 632 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 85.7% indicates a generally successful landing with some areas for improvement. Let's break down the different phases of the landing to see where adjustments can be made to achieve an even higher score.
During the Approach Phase, it was noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit. This could have contributed to the slightly high threshold height in the Landing Phase. To improve in this area, pilots should strive to maintain a precise descent path in accordance with the glideslope to ensure a smoother approach.
In the Landing Phase, the threshold height was slightly above the target, but the good landing flare helped in achieving a successful touchdown. It is important to continue working on achieving the ideal threshold height to improve overall landing performance.
The Touchdown Phase had some positive aspects, such as an excellent touchdown rate and on-target speed. However, landing slightly beyond the touchdown zone and off-center from the runway's centerline indicate the need for a more precise touchdown point alignment. Additionally, landing with a 3 kn tailwind is a safety concern that should be avoided in future landings.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was slightly off from the centerline. Pilots should continue to practice maintaining proper runway alignment to ensure safe and efficient rollouts.
Despite these areas for improvement, it is important to acknowledge the strengths of the landing, such as the good landing flare and on-target speed. By focusing on precision in descent path, threshold height, touchdown point alignment, and runway alignment, future landings can achieve an even higher score and contribute to overall flight safety and efficiency. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in aircraft landings.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values