Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Settle the descent rate
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 10 stages, 9 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: seven checks where the approach path is 300 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out. These checks are the approach's score.
At the 300 ft gate: sink rate 2,038 fpm, more than the glideslope needed, centreline 7.1° off, against a 1° limit, wings 13° of bank, against a 10° limit and speed 34 kt FAST on the reference speed of 56 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 2,080 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the full 2,080 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 762 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The 1.69 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from EDCX Flugplatz Purkshof, the XCub aircraft initiated its departure roll on runway 27, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 72 kt. The takeoff distance of 2,105 ft accounted for 82% of the available runway length. Local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 59 °F and a moderate wind of 10 kt from a direction of 11 °, resulting in a slight tailwind component of 3 kt.
Following a brief enroute level cruise phase overhead Roevershagen, the aircraft transitioned into an enroute climb phase, ascending from 318 ft above sea level to 1,020 ft in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 2 nm. This climb phase was followed by a prolonged enroute level cruise phase overhead Moenchhagen, lasting 22 minutes and covering a distance of 42 nm. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 08 at EDCW Wismar Airfield, aligning with the runway from the west at a heading of 79.0 ° and an altitude of 60 ft above ground level.
The XCub aircraft touched down on runway 08 at EDCW Wismar Airfield, with a touchdown distance of 603 ft, accounting for 39% of the available runway length. The touchdown speed of 45 kt was within acceptable limits, while the touchdown rate of -202 fpm was fair. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centreline by 20 ft. Following touchdown, the aircraft experienced a slight misalignment during rollout, deviating from the centreline by 41 ft. The total landing distance of 817 ft was within acceptable limits, and the aircraft utilized 23 lbs of fuel for the entire flight, covering a distance of 44 nm in 26 minutes.
The final approach to runway 08 at EDCW Wismar Airfield from the west was executed with good quality, with the aircraft maintaining a heading of 79.0° at 0 nm and 60 ft above ground level. The pilot successfully managed the descent, achieving a good threshold height and maintaining a threshold speed of 57 kt. The touchdown distance of 603 ft was within acceptable limits, and the touchdown speed of 45 kt was also satisfactory.
However, the touchdown rate of -202 fpm was only fair, indicating a slightly higher-than-desired rate of descent. The aircraft touched down slightly off-centreline, 20 ft to the left of the runway centreline. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 59°F and a 10 kt wind at 10°, contributed to a crosswind of 9 kt and a headwind of 4 kt. Despite these conditions, the pilot maintained control of the aircraft throughout the landing.
The total landing distance of 817 ft was 39% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned, with the aircraft deviating 41 ft to the left of the centreline. Overall, the landing was considered satisfactory, with a score of 92.4%. While there were some minor deviations from ideal performance, the pilot demonstrated good control and management of the aircraft throughout the approach and landing phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values