Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 27 stages, 25 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,825 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 346 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 81.1% indicates a fairly successful landing, with some areas that could use improvement.
During the Approach Phase, the descent path was above the glideslope limit and the speed was slightly below target. It is important to work on maintaining a more precise descent path and ensuring that the speed is accurate to achieve a smoother approach.
In the Landing Phase, the threshold height was above target, and there was a very poor landing flare and poor bank angle stability during landing. These factors can affect the smoothness and precision of the touchdown, so it would be beneficial to focus on improving these aspects for future landings.
However, in the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was firm, and the speed was on target. Additionally, the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position were very good. These are positive aspects that show good control and accuracy during the touchdown phase.
In the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was 14.1 meters from the centerline. This indicates that there may have been some difficulty in maintaining the centerline during rollout.
Overall, while there were some areas that could use improvement, such as descent path, landing flare, and runway alignment, there were also positive aspects such as touchdown rate, touchdown distance, and runway touchdown position. With some practice and focus on these areas, you can continue to improve your landing performance and achieve even better scores in the future. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for accuracy and precision in your landings.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values