Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Reduce your height at the threshold
Even a modest height error carries straight through to the touchdown. Geometry alone says that crossing the threshold 10 feet high on a 3° path moves your touchdown roughly 190 feet further down the runway before the flare adds anything.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 13 stages, 12 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks at 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
Side view — the last 1,242 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,242 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 233 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The 1.99 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, this aircraft landing was characterized by several key issues throughout the different phases of the landing sequence.
During the Approach Phase, the aircraft displayed poor descent path control above the glideslope limit, indicating that the descent was steeper than necessary. Additionally, the aircraft exhibited poor heading alignment, which could have contributed to the issues with runway alignment in later phases. However, the speed was on target during this phase.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, there were significant concerns with the approach to the runway. The threshold height was excessively high, which could have led to a longer landing distance. Additionally, the landing flare was very poor, indicating that the aircraft likely did not smoothly transition from descent to touchdown. The poor bank angle stability during landing may have contributed to the issues with runway alignment and touchdown distance.
In the Touchdown Phase, the aircraft experienced a very heavy touchdown rate, indicating a potentially hard landing. The speed was also above target during this phase, which could have contributed to the heavy touchdown. The touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone suggests that the aircraft may have touched down earlier than intended, while the runway touchdown position being 3.2 meters from the centerline indicates poor alignment.
Finally, the Rollout Phase showed that the runway alignment continued to be an issue, with the aircraft being 3.5 meters from the centerline. This could have been a continuation of the poor heading alignment seen in the Approach Phase.
In conclusion, this aircraft landing demonstrated a series of issues throughout the different phases, including poor descent path control, heading alignment, landing flare, touchdown rate, speed control, and runway alignment. These factors combined to create a landing that was not optimal and may have posed safety risks.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values