Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smaller, smoother aileron inputs to hold the climb bank angle near wings-level.
What happened: During Climb 3 the bank angle averaged 1.1°, well beyond a steady wings-level climb.
Watch for: Attitude indicator - bank angle, keeping it close to wings-level through the climb.
Arrival
Begin raising the nose sooner, at 11 ft, rather than waiting until 2.6 ft.
What happened: The flare began late at 2.6 ft, below the normal band.
Watch for: Radio altimeter approaching 11 ft as the cue to start the flare.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 28 stages, 26 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,855 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,855 m of the 2,822 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 706 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 777F, then departed from runway 15L at Toronto Lester B. Pearson International Airport. The takeoff distance was 2,149 meters, which accounted for 64% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 176 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions of a temperature of 13 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 2 knots at 309 degrees. The crosswind was negligible, but there was a tailwind of 2 knots. The enroute climb started overhead Eringate-Centennial-West Deane, Ontario, Canada, where the aircraft climbed from 1,537 feet above sea level to 33,233 feet above sea level, an increase of 31,696 feet in 16 minutes, covering a distance of 106 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started 6 miles north of Belleville Aerodrome, Belleville, Ontario, Canada, and lasted for 5 minutes, covering 44 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another enroute climb, this time from 33,218 feet above sea level to 34,949 feet above sea level, an increase of 1,731 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 14 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise continued, starting 6 miles south of Smiths Falls, Ontario, Canada, and lasted for 198 minutes, covering a distance of 1,565 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another enroute climb, this time from 35,652 feet above sea level to 37,027 feet above sea level, an increase of 1,375 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 13 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise continued once more, starting at a location with a latitude of 52.6145805 and a longitude of -37.4247288, and lasted for 182 minutes, covering a distance of 1,405 nautical miles. The enroute descent started 8 miles northeast of Sea Palling, Norfolk, England, where the aircraft descended from 37,427 feet above sea level to 2,503 feet above sea level, a decrease of 34,924 feet in 20 minutes, covering a distance of 116 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 36R at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol began from the south, heading 3.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,217 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 36R was successful, with a touchdown point 289 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 136 knots, which was good, and the touchdown rate was -154 feet per minute, which was also good.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.8 meters from the centerline, but the runway rollout alignment was very good. The total landing distance was 1,773 meters, which accounted for 63% of the runway. The taxiing to the parking from the runway took 5 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 3,287 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 450 minutes. The aircraft used 55,127 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 777F aircraft successfully landed at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, achieving a score of 88.1%. The final approach to runway 36R was initiated from the south, with a heading of 3.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,217 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's approach was characterized by a good threshold speed of 146 knots, which is within the acceptable range for a safe landing.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's performance was satisfactory, with a touchdown speed of 136 knots, which is slightly below the recommended speed but still within the acceptable range. The touchdown rate of -154 feet per minute (fpm) was also good, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. However, the touchdown point was 289 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which may indicate a slight deviation from the intended landing path.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.8 meters from the centerline, which may be attributed to a minor deviation in the aircraft's approach or a slight wind effect. The local weather conditions were favorable, with a temperature of 16°C and a wind speed of 4 knots at 0°, resulting in a negligible crosswind component and a headwind of 4 knots.
The total landing distance of 1,773 meters was 63% of the available runway length, which is within the acceptable range. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft's brakes were applied smoothly and effectively, allowing for a controlled deceleration.
Overall, the landing was successful, with the aircraft achieving a good touchdown speed, rate, and rollout alignment. However, the slight deviation from the intended landing path and the touchdown point beyond the designated zone may require further attention to ensure optimal performance and safety.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values