Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smoother, smaller aileron inputs to keep the wings level and hold bank angle near wings-level during the climb.
What happened: During the climb, bank angle rose to 6.9°, more roll than the climb out called for.
Watch for: Attitude indicator: wings level during the climb
Arrival
Keep the back pressure coming once the flare is established, holding the attitude instead of letting the nose drop.
What happened: Sink came back after the flare had arrested it, and that pattern usually carries the touchdown long - here it landed at 826 m against the 457 m aim point.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a steady, shallow rate through the flare with no renewed sink before touchdown
Ground effect becomes significant below about one wingspan of height. A Cessna 172, with a 36 ft span, enters ground effect at flare height - the float it feels in the hold-off is ground effect arriving on cue. An A320, with a span around 117 ft, has been in ground effect since before the threshold and there is no sudden cushion to feel, only a gradual reduction in induced drag that lengthens any float you allow.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 16 stages, 14 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,759 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,759 m of the 2,942 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 826 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Taxiing from the parking area to the runway at ESSA Stockholm-Arlanda Airport took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its departure roll on runway 19R, utilizing 23% of the available runway length to achieve a takeoff distance of 746 meters. Liftoff speed was reached at 137 knots, with a local temperature of 11°C and wind conditions of 16 knots at 169 degrees, resulting in a 6-knot crosswind and a 15-knot headwind.
The enroute climb commenced approximately 1 mile northeast of Maersta, Sweden, where the aircraft ascended from 1,261 feet above sea level to 38,019 feet, a vertical increase of 36,758 feet, in 14 minutes and covering a distance of 97 nautical miles. The climb was followed by a descent from 37,989 feet to 9,991 feet, a decrease of 27,997 feet, in 14 minutes and covering 100 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered a level cruise phase, lasting 5 minutes and covering 18 nautical miles, before initiating a descent from 10,004 feet to 2,004 feet, a decrease of 8,000 feet, in 9 minutes and covering 36 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 01R at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, was conducted from the south, with a heading of 16.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,318 feet above ground level.
The aircraft landed on runway 01R, utilizing 57% of the available runway length, with a total landing distance of 1,673 meters. Touchdown speed was 105 knots, and the touchdown rate was -248 feet per minute. Runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and runway rollout alignment was very good. Taxiing from the runway to the parking area took 8 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The total flight distance was 262 nautical miles, with a flight time of 1 hour and a fuel consumption of 742 kilograms.
The aircraft, C750, successfully completed a landing on runway 01R at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a final approach from the south. The approach quality was good, with a heading of 16.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,318 feet above ground level. The aircraft maintained a steady descent, and the threshold height was well-managed, allowing for a smooth touchdown.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's speed was 105 knots, which was within the acceptable range. The touchdown point was 405 meters beyond the touchdown zone, indicating a slight overrun. However, the touchdown rate of -248 feet per minute was fair, considering the runway conditions. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with the aircraft centered on the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 5°C and a headwind of 3 knots, contributed to a relatively smooth landing.
The total landing distance of 1,673 meters was 57% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range. The runway rollout alignment was very good, with the aircraft maintaining its centerline alignment throughout the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was considered satisfactory, with a score of 92.0%. The pilot's performance was commendable, considering the challenging weather conditions and the need to manage the aircraft's speed and descent rate effectively.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values