Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the takeoff
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,594 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 435 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft taxiing from the parking area to the runway at ESSA Stockholm-Arlanda Airport, taking approximately 8 minutes to cover a distance of 1 nautical mile. The departure roll took place on runway 08, with the aircraft lifting off at a speed of 155 knots. The local weather conditions at the time of takeoff were characterized by a temperature of -2 °C, with a wind speed of 7 knots at a direction of 90 °.
As the aircraft climbed away from the airport, it began its enroute climb 2 miles east of ESSA Stockholm-Arlanda Airport, rising from an altitude of 1,087 feet above sea level to 33,619 feet above sea level in 16 minutes, covering a distance of 87 nautical miles. The climb was a significant increase of 32,532 feet.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, starting 3 miles northwest of Stora in Örebro County, Sweden. This phase lasted for 2 minutes and covered a distance of 12 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent 6 miles northeast of Grythyttan in Örebro County, Sweden, descending from 34,008 feet above sea level to 10,369 feet above sea level in 14 minutes, covering a distance of 85 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, starting 7 miles northeast of Bjorkelangen in Viken, Norway. This phase lasted for 6 minutes and covered a distance of 23 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent 1 mile southwest of ENSV Trøgstad Airfield Skjonhaug in Viken, Norway, descending from 9,599 feet above sea level to 2,154 feet above sea level in 8 minutes, covering a distance of 29 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 01L at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen was made from the south, with the aircraft heading at 16.0 ° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,470 feet above ground level. The landing took place on runway 01L, which had a length of 3,594 meters. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -6 °C, with a wind speed of 4 knots at a direction of 20 °.
The landing was successful, with the aircraft touching down at a speed of 132 knots, which was slightly faster than the threshold speed. However, the touchdown rate was good at -168 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good. The total landing distance was 1,422 meters, which was 40% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, and the aircraft taxied to the parking area in 3 minutes, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
In total, the flight covered a distance of 244 nautical miles, taking 59 minutes to complete, and used 2,104 kilograms of fuel.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed on runway 01L at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a score of 99.8%. The aircraft approached the runway from the south, heading 16.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,470 feet above ground level (agl). The pilot maintained a good threshold height, which is a crucial aspect of a safe landing.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's threshold speed was recorded at 135 knots, which is within the acceptable range. The touchdown distance of 436 meters was also satisfactory, indicating that the pilot had sufficient control over the aircraft during the landing phase. However, the touchdown speed of 132 knots was slightly higher than the recommended speed, which may have resulted in a slightly longer landing distance.
Despite the slightly fast touchdown speed, the aircraft's touchdown rate of -168 feet per minute (fpm) was good, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. The runway touchdown alignment was also very good, which is essential for a safe landing. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -6°C and a wind speed of 4 knots from a direction of 20°. The crosswind component was negligible, while the headwind component was 4 knots, which may have contributed to the slightly fast touchdown speed.
The total landing distance of 1,422 meters was 40% of the runway length, which is a reasonable distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating that the pilot had maintained control over the aircraft during the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was successful, and the pilot's skills and experience were evident throughout the process.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values