Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 35 stages, 33 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,700 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 171 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, this aircraft landing scored a commendable 95.6%, which is an excellent result. Let's break down the analysis of each phase of the landing to provide a more detailed understanding of the performance.
During the Approach Phase, the descent path was slightly below the glideslope limit, which could be improved upon in future landings. However, the speed was only slightly below target, indicating good control and awareness by the pilot.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's great to see that the threshold height was good and the landing flare was executed perfectly. This shows a high level of skill and precision during the critical moments before touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was fair, and the speed was right on target. Additionally, the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone is a positive indicator of a well-controlled landing. The runway touchdown position, being 4.6 m from the centreline, shows good alignment with the runway.
Finally, during the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was slightly off at 7.6 m from the centreline. While this can be improved for a more precise landing, overall, this did not significantly impact the overall performance of the landing.
To conclude, this aircraft landing demonstrated excellent proficiency in most aspects, with minor areas that could be refined for an even better score in the future. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in all phases of the landing process. Well done on achieving a 95.6% score – a truly impressive accomplishment!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values