Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 2,065 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,065 m of the 3,731 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 891 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Great job on achieving an aircraft landing score of 82.5%! It's always important to reflect on areas that can be improved to continue striving for excellence.
Let's break down the different phases of the landing and identify where there is room for improvement:
Approach Phase: The descent path was above the glideslope limit and the speed was slightly above target. To improve, focus on maintaining a stable descent path and ensuring that the speed is within the designated target range for a more consistent approach.
Landing Phase: The threshold height was significantly above the target and the landing flare was very poor. Work on ensuring a smoother transition from descent to landing by practicing proper flare techniques and aiming for a more precise threshold height to improve overall landing performance.
Touchdown Phase: The touchdown rate was fair and speed was on target, which is a good starting point. However, landing 458 m beyond the touchdown zone indicates the need to adjust touchdown point and runway touchdown position to align with the designated parameters.
Rollout Phase: The runway alignment was slightly off, with a deviation of 4.8 m from the centerline. Focus on improving runway alignment during the rollout phase to enhance overall landing accuracy.
Remember, every landing is a learning opportunity, and with continued practice and attention to detail, you can further refine your skills and achieve even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the great work and stay motivated in your pursuit of excellence in aircraft landings!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values