Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 24 stages, 22 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with five checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,797 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,797 m of the 4,001 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 656 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 7 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 777-300, then departed from runway 23L at Düsseldorf Airport (EDDL) in Germany. The takeoff distance was 1,928 meters, which was 81% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 188 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to its initial cruising altitude, it encountered local weather conditions of 12°C temperature and a wind speed of 11 knots at 150°. The crosswind was 11 knots, while the headwind was 1 knot. The enroute climb started 1 mile northeast of Meerbusch, Germany, and reached an altitude of 30,226 feet above sea level (asl) after climbing 29,095 feet in 17 minutes, covering a distance of 88 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered a level cruise phase, which started 1 mile south of Neu-Anspach, Germany, and lasted for 84 minutes, covering a distance of 659 nautical miles. The aircraft continued to climb and level off at various points, including 1 mile east of Sasciori, Romania, and 2 miles west of Orlat, Romania. The climb from 30,138 feet asl to 31,913 feet asl in 2 minutes covered a distance of 14 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 34 miles south of Beleuli North, Uzbekistan, and lasted for 218 minutes, covering a distance of 1,852 nautical miles. The aircraft continued to climb and level off at various points, including 50 miles southwest of Beleuli North, Uzbekistan, and 44 miles west of Ejin Banner Taolai Airport, China. The climb from 33,478 feet asl to 35,406 feet asl in 3 minutes covered a distance of 33 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered a long level cruise phase, which started 12 miles southwest of Ejin Banner Taolai Airport, China, and lasted for 564 minutes, covering a distance of 1,558 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent, which started overhead Yonago Kitaro Airport, Japan, and ended at an altitude of 1,317 feet asl after descending 35,133 feet in 22 minutes, covering a distance of 115 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 06L at Kansai International Airport (RJBB) was made from the southwest, heading 51.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,285 feet above ground level (agl). The landing was made on the runway, which was 4,001 meters long. The threshold height was above the target, while the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 150 knots.
The touchdown point was 205 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was 138 knots, which was a little fast. The touchdown rate was good at -151 feet per minute (fpm). The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 9.5 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 11°C temperature and a wind speed of 13 knots at 60°, with a crosswind of 2 knots and a headwind of 13 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,681 meters, which was 42% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 9.4 meters from the centerline. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 4 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 5,765 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 725 minutes.
The Boeing 777-300 aircraft successfully landed at RJBB Kansai International Airport, but with some minor deviations from the ideal landing parameters. The final approach was initiated from the southwest, heading 51.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,285 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft touched down on runway 06L, which has a length of 4,001 meters.
The threshold height at 65 feet agl was above the target, indicating that the aircraft was slightly higher than desired when reaching the runway threshold. Additionally, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 150 knots, suggesting that the aircraft was moving at a slightly faster pace than intended when reaching the threshold. The touchdown point was 205 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively minor deviation.
The touchdown speed of 138 knots was a little fast, indicating that the aircraft could have benefited from a slightly gentler descent to reduce the speed at touchdown. However, the touchdown rate of -151 feet per minute (fpm) was good, suggesting that the aircraft was able to absorb the impact of touchdown effectively.
The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 9.5 meters from the centerline, which is a relatively minor deviation. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 11°C, with a wind speed of 13 knots at 60°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, while the headwind component was 13 knots, which likely contributed to the aircraft's slightly faster than intended threshold speed.
The total landing distance was 1,681 meters, which is 42% of the runway length. This is a relatively normal landing distance, considering the aircraft's size and weight. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 9.4 meters from the centerline, which is a minor deviation that can be easily corrected during subsequent landings.
Overall, the landing was successful, but with some minor deviations from the ideal parameters. These deviations can be addressed through adjustments to the aircraft's approach and landing procedures to improve the accuracy and consistency of future landings.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values