Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 23 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 2,093 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,093 m of the 3,364 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 742 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, achieving a landing score of 88.8% is a commendable accomplishment, and I applaud the pilot for their efforts. While there were some areas that could be improved upon, it is important to recognize the strengths displayed throughout the various phases of the landing process.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was above glideslope limit. This indicates room for improvement in maintaining a more precise descent path in order to achieve a smoother approach. However, it is encouraging to see that the Landing Phase showcased a well above target threshold height and a fair touchdown rate. It is important to build upon these strengths and continue to refine the landing technique.
Moving on to the Touchdown Phase, it is noted that the landing flare was very poor. This aspect of the landing process is crucial in ensuring a smooth touchdown and should be an area of focus for improvement in future landings. Despite this, it is encouraging to see that the touchdown speed was on target and the touchdown point was only 300m beyond the designated zone. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was marked as very good, indicating a strong ability to align the aircraft accurately on landing.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, it is noted that the runway alignment was very good. This is a positive indication of the pilot's ability to maintain control of the aircraft during the rollout process, ensuring a safe and efficient landing.
In conclusion, while there are areas that could be improved upon, it is important to acknowledge the strengths displayed in each phase of the landing process. By building upon these strengths and addressing areas for improvement, the pilot can continue to enhance their skills and strive for even higher landing scores in the future. Keep up the hard work and dedication to improvement, and success will surely follow.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values