Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Wait for the normal flare band and the correct speed before raising the nose, rather than starting the flare at 103 ft.
What happened: The flare began at 103 ft, 58 ft above the normal band, and the touchdown followed at 307 fpm. Starting the flare this early usually carries through to a firmer arrival than a flare begun in the normal band.
Watch for: Radio altimeter: hold the flare start within the normal flare band
When Vr arrives, an abrupt near-full-scale pull, pitch overshoots, a push, and an oscillation through the first 200 ft. It feels like “this aircraft is twitchy” but the actual fault happened before liftoff. The pitch trace needs to show a clean ramp during liftoff.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,193 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 299 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The Airbus A320-ceo taxied from the parking area to runway 26R at EDDM Munich Airport, covering 2 nm in 12 minutes.
During the departure roll on runway 26R, the aircraft used a take-off distance of 2,199 m, representing 55 % of the runway, and lifted off at 164 kt. Ambient conditions were 9 °C temperature, wind 2 kt from 090°, zero cross-wind and a 2 kt tail-wind component.
Climb commenced 1 mile west of EDDM, with the airplane accelerating from 2,512 ft asl to 37,174 ft asl, an altitude gain of 34,662 ft achieved in 20 minutes while covering 134 nm.
The first cruise segment began 1 mile north of Canal San Bovo in Italy and lasted 49 minutes, during which 367 nm were flown at level altitude.
Descent started 48 nm south of Ponza, Italy, with a reduction from 37,560 ft asl to 5,443 ft asl, a loss of 32,117 ft over 20 minutes and a distance of 120 nm.
A second cruise phase was initiated 14 nm north-east of San Vito Lo Capo, lasting 5 minutes and covering 20 nm.
The subsequent descent began 5 nm north-east of San Vito Lo Capo, descending from 4,601 ft asl to 1,334 ft asl, a decrease of 3,267 ft in 4 minutes over 13 nm.
Final approach to runway 07 at LICJ Falcone-Borsellino Airport reduced altitude from 1,340 ft agl to 41 ft agl in 100 seconds, and the aircraft scored on the stabilisation gates.
Landing on runway 07, which is 3,193 m long, occurred with a threshold speed of 137 kt. Touchdown was recorded 301 m down the runway at 130 kt, with a firm touchdown rate of minus 316 fpm and a lateral deviation of 3.2 m from the centreline. Local weather reported 19 °C temperature, wind 5 kt from 170°, a 4 kt cross-wind and a 1 kt tail-wind. The total landing distance was 1,429 m, equivalent to 45 % of the runway.
Runway rollout alignment was perfect, confirming a straight-ahead exit from the runway.
The aircraft taxied from the runway to the parking area in 7 minutes, covering less than 1 nm.
In total, the flight covered 664 nm, lasted 120 minutes, and consumed 4,279 kg of fuel.
The Boeing 777-300 aircraft successfully landed at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (HKJK) on runway 06. The final approach was initiated from the southwest, heading 54.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,291 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft maintained a good threshold height, and the threshold speed was also satisfactory at 147 knots.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft landed 245 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which is slightly beyond the expected area. The touchdown speed of 145 knots was a bit faster than ideal, indicating that the pilot may have needed to apply more braking force to slow down the aircraft. The touchdown rate of -295 feet per minute (fpm) was considered fair, suggesting that the pilot managed to control the descent but could have done better.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.7 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's alignment during the final approach. However, the runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot maintained control of the aircraft during the rollout phase.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 19°C and a gentle wind of 2 knots at 40°. The crosswind component was minimal at 1 knot, and the headwind component was 2 knots, which helped to stabilize the aircraft during the landing.
Overall, the landing was considered satisfactory, with a total landing distance of 1,916 meters, which is 46% of the runway length. While there were some minor deviations from the ideal landing parameters, the pilot managed to bring the aircraft safely to the ground, and the runway rollout was well-controlled.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values