Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 28 ft off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 6,149 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 6,149 ft of the 11,316 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 2,151 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 17 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 08 at MUC Ignacio Agramonte International Airport. The takeoff distance was 3,830 feet, which was 39% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 150 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 79°F and a wind speed of 2 knots from a direction of 290°. The crosswind and tailwind components were both 2 knots. As the aircraft climbed, it started to ascend from 1,400 feet above sea level to 26,121 feet, an increase of 24,721 feet in 13 minutes, covering a distance of 75 nautical miles.
The enroute climb started 1 mile northeast of MUC Ignacio Agramonte International Airport, and the aircraft continued to climb until it reached its cruising altitude. The enroute level cruise started 4 miles east of MUJA Jatibonico South Airport and lasted for 31 minutes, covering a distance of 194 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its descent from 26,119 feet above sea level to 1,285 feet, a decrease of 24,834 feet in 20 minutes, covering a distance of 86 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 09 at KMIA Miami International Airport was made from the west, heading 87.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,264 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 09 was successful, with a touchdown point 817 feet beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was slightly above the target at 147 knots, and the touchdown rate was fair at -247 feet per minute. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 11 feet from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 86°F and a wind speed of 2 knots from a direction of 360°.
The total landing distance was 5,915 feet, which was 52% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 3 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 366 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 77 minutes. The aircraft used 8,704 pounds of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at Miami International Airport (KMIA) on runway 09, achieving a score of 92.8%. The final approach was initiated from the west, heading 87.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,264 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's approach was characterized by a good threshold height, indicating a stable and controlled descent.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's threshold speed was slightly above the target speed of 147 knots, which may have contributed to a slightly faster touchdown speed of 141 knots. However, the touchdown rate of -247 feet per minute (fpm) was considered fair, suggesting that the aircraft's descent was not excessively steep. The touchdown point was located 817 feet beyond the touchdown zone, which may indicate a slight over-shooting of the intended touchdown point.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 11 feet from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's approach path. Despite this, the runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft's brakes were applied smoothly and effectively to bring the aircraft to a stop.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 86°F and a wind speed of 2 knots from 360°. This resulted in a negligible crosswind component of 1 knot and a headwind component of 0 knots. The total landing distance of 5,915 feet was 52% of the available runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score and demonstrating good control and stability throughout the approach and touchdown phases. However, there were some minor deviations from the ideal touchdown point and speed, which may be addressed through further training and practice.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values