Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,477 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 608 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
First and foremost, congratulations on achieving a landing score of 89.2%! This is a significant accomplishment and something to be proud of.
Let's break down the different phases of the landing and see where improvements can be made.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it's noted that the descent path was poor and above the glideslope limit. This can be a challenging aspect of the landing process, but with practice and focus, it can be improved. Consider closely monitoring your altitude and adjusting your descent rate accordingly to stay on track.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's highlighted that the threshold height was above the target and the landing flare was very poor. Improving your approach and timing of the flare will be key here. Remember to maintain a steady descent and smoothly transition into the flare to ensure a smoother touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, there are some positive aspects such as a smooth touchdown rate and on-target speed. However, there is room for improvement with the touchdown point being 171m beyond the touchdown zone. Aim to improve your accuracy and aim for a touchdown closer to the designated zone for better efficiency.
Additionally, the runway touchdown position being 3.1m from the centerline is noted. Pay attention to your alignment and aim to improve your positioning for a more precise landing.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, it's mentioned that the runway alignment was very good. This is a positive aspect that demonstrates good control and precision during the landing rollout.
Overall, your landing score of 89.2% showcases a strong performance with areas for improvement in specific phases of the landing process. By focusing on these areas and practicing diligently, you can continue to enhance your skills and achieve even higher scores in the future. Keep up the great work and continue striving for excellence in your aircraft landings!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values