This flight was conducted in a Cessna 152 aircraft, starting with an enroute climb from an altitude of 3,302 feet above sea level (asl) over the town of Bran, which is located in Brasov, Romania. The aircraft successfully climbed to an altitude of 3,600 feet asl, achieving an increase of 299 feet in just 1 minute while covering a distance of 2 nautical miles.
Following the climb, the aircraft began its enroute descent from an altitude of 3,593 feet asl, located approximately 1 mile northeast of Bran. The descent was completed in 2 minutes, during which the aircraft decreased its altitude by 1,409 feet to reach a final altitude of 2,184 feet asl. The descent also covered a distance of 2 nautical miles.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down before the threshold, indicating a precise approach and alignment with the runway. The touchdown speed of 32 knots was considered good, and the touchdown rate of 406 feet per minute was perfect. The runway touchdown alignment was also very good, demonstrating the pilot's skill and control during the landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 11 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 2 knots from a direction of 352 degrees. The crosswind was minimal at 1 knot, while the headwind was also 1 knot, indicating a relatively calm and stable environment.
The total landing distance covered by the aircraft was 111 meters, which accounted for only 23% of the runway length. This indicates a short and controlled landing, with the aircraft coming to a stop quickly and efficiently. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, demonstrating the pilot's ability to maintain control and stability during the landing roll.
In terms of overall performance, the flight distance was 4 nautical miles, which was completed in 4 minutes. Notably, the aircraft used no fuel during the flight, suggesting a highly efficient and optimized operation.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Enroute climb started overhead Bran (Brasov, Romania). Climbing from 3,302 ft asl to 3,600 ft asl, an increase of 299 ft in 1 minutes and covering 2 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 69 kt 57 kt min to max 91 kt |
63 | 91 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 4.2 ° 0.0 ° min to max 22.7 ° |
0.0 | 1.4 ° | |
| 83.14 % |
Average g force 1.00 g -0.09 g min to max 1.43 g |
0.62 | 1.02 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 396 fpm -332 fpm min to max 750 fpm |
98 | 406 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 3,570 ft asl 3,302 ft asl min to max 3,776 ft asl |
3,302 | 3,600 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 4.4 ° -14.4 ° min to max 11.7 ° |
10.1 | -1.2 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Battery Master On at 15:42:36 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 1 Started at 15:42:36 |
|||
| Info |
Beacon Lights Switched On at 15:42:36 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights Switched On at 15:42:36 |
|||
| Info |
Strobe Lights Switched On at 15:42:36 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Lights Switched On at 15:42:48 |
|||
| Info |
Taxi Lights Switched On at 15:42:48 |
|||
| Info |
Strobe Lights Switched Off at 15:42:49 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights Switched Off at 15:42:50 |
|||
| Info |
Pitot Heat Switched On at 15:42:50 |
Enroute descent started 1 mile north east of Bran (Brasov, Romania). Descent from 3,593 ft asl to 2,184 ft asl, a decrease of 1,409 ft in 2 minutes and covering 2 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 49 kt 32 kt min to max 91 kt |
91 | 32 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 1.5 ° 0.0 ° min to max 13.6 ° |
0.8 | 1.2 ° | |
| 95.43 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.34 g min to max 1.38 g |
0.88 | 1.04 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 406 fpm 406 fpm min to max 406 fpm |
406 | 406 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 2,500 ft asl 2,184 ft asl min to max 3,593 ft asl |
3,593 | 2,184 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -0.2 ° -9.3 ° min to max 7.2 ° |
-2.7 | 7.2 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 15:44:55 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 3 at 15:44:56 |
Touchdown was before threshold. Touchdown speed at 32 kt was good. Touchdown rate was perfect at 406 fpm. Runway touchdown alignment was very good. Local weather - Temperature 11 °C. Wind 2 kt at 352 °. Crosswind: 1 kt Headwind: 1 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Touchdown VSI was 406 fpm. |
|||
| 0 % |
Touchdown distance was 0 m Target 305 m |
|||
| 100 % |
Speed at touchdown 32 kt Target below 42 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Runway alignment max 2.88 m 2.85 m left |
2.88 | 2.84 m | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.7 ° 0.5 ° min to max 1.2 ° |
1.2 | 0.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.09 g 1.04 g min to max 1.16 g |
1.04 | 1.05 g | |
| 100 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 32 kt 32 kt min to max 32 kt |
32 | 32 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 7.3 ° 7.0 ° min to max 7.5 ° |
7.2 | 7.0 ° |
Total landing distance 111 m, 23 % of runway. Runway rollout alignment was perfect.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Landing distance 111 m 23 % of runway. |
|||
| 100 % |
Runway alignment max 2.99 m 2.99 m left to 0.00 m left |
2.84 | 2.60 m | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.01 g 0.99 g min to max 1.05 g |
1.04 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 40 kt 31 kt min to max 41 kt |
41 | 31 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.8 ° -0.5 ° min to max 6.9 ° |
6.9 | 0.6 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.3 ° 0.1 ° min to max 0.5 ° |
0.5 | 0.3 ° |
Exiting runway, average speed 4 kt
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 15 kt 3 kt min to max 27 kt |
27 | 3 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 0.1 ° -0.0 ° min to max 0.4 ° |
0.3 | -0.0 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.2 ° 0.1 ° min to max 0.2 ° |
0.2 | 0.2 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.99 g min to max 1.01 g |
0.99 | 1.00 g |
The Cessna 152 aircraft successfully landed with a score of 100.0%, demonstrating exceptional piloting skills. The touchdown occurred before the threshold, which is a desirable outcome as it allows the aircraft to maintain a safe distance from obstacles and other aircraft on the runway. The touchdown speed of 32 kt was well within the acceptable range, indicating that the pilot had maintained control of the aircraft throughout the descent.
The touchdown rate of 406 fpm was also perfect, suggesting that the pilot had carefully managed the aircraft's descent to ensure a smooth and controlled touchdown. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot had maintained the aircraft's alignment with the runway centerline throughout the approach and landing.
The local weather conditions were favorable for the landing, with a temperature of 11 °C and a relatively light wind of 2 kt at 352°. The crosswind component was minimal at 1 kt, and the headwind component was also 1 kt, which helped to reduce the aircraft's ground speed and make the landing more manageable. The total landing distance of 111 m was only 23% of the runway length, indicating that the pilot had made a very efficient landing.
The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, suggesting that the pilot had maintained control of the aircraft throughout the rollout and had brought it to a stop in a safe and controlled manner. Overall, this landing was a textbook example of a well-executed approach and landing, and the pilot's skills and attention to detail were evident throughout the entire process.
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values