Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Make small rudder corrections against a fixed point at the far end of the runway to stop the drift as soon as it starts in the flare.
What happened: On the landing you drifted 9.3 m off the centreline, and that kind of lateral drift usually carries through to a touchdown point 9.4 m off centreline and into a rollout that is still skewed off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Heading indicator: track straight down the extended runway centreline through touchdown and rollout.
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,813 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,813 m of the 2,698 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 414 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Tulsa International Airport (KTUL) took approximately 6 minutes, covering a distance of 1 nautical mile. The Boeing 737-800 then began its departure roll on runway 36R, utilizing 58% of the runway's length to achieve a takeoff distance of 1,777 meters. Liftoff speed was reached at 159 knots, with a headwind component of 13 knots and a crosswind of 3 knots.
As the aircraft climbed away from KTUL, it transitioned into an enroute climb, ascending from 1,645 feet above sea level to 35,223 feet in 21 minutes, covering a distance of 148 nautical miles. The climb phase was followed by a level cruise, which commenced 1 mile east of Marshall Field Fair Grove (MO14) and lasted for 116 minutes, covering a distance of 954 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 1 mile east of Cropseyville (New York), and descended from 34,453 feet to 1,290 feet in 29 minutes, covering a distance of 151 nautical miles.
The Boeing 737-800 then initiated its final approach to runway 04R at Logan International Airport (KBOS), aligning with the runway from the south at a heading of 20.0 degrees. The aircraft touched down on the runway at a speed of 138 knots, with a touchdown distance of 412 meters, utilizing 75% of the runway's length. The touchdown rate was fair at -237 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centerline by 10.1 meters. Following a successful landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, taking approximately 5 minutes to cover a distance of 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,261 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 178 minutes and a fuel consumption of 7,313 kilograms.
The Boeing 737-800 touched down on runway 04R at KBOS Logan International Airport with a good threshold height, allowing the crew to maintain a stable approach profile. The final approach was initiated from the south, heading 20.0° at 4 nm and 1,266 ft above ground level. The aircraft's speed was well-managed, with a threshold speed of 144 kt, which was within the acceptable range. The touchdown distance of 412 m was also satisfactory, indicating a controlled descent.
However, the touchdown speed of 138 kt was slightly above the optimal range, resulting in a fair touchdown rate of -237 fpm. The runway touchdown position was not perfectly aligned with the centreline, deviating by 10.1 m. This slight misalignment was also evident during the rollout phase, where the aircraft was 9.8 m off-centreline. Despite these minor deviations, the overall landing performance was satisfactory.
The total landing distance of 1,735 m was 75% of the runway length, indicating a controlled rollout. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 9 °C, did not appear to have a significant impact on the landing performance. Overall, the crew's skills and the aircraft's handling characteristics resulted in a score of 96.0%, reflecting a high level of proficiency in executing a safe and controlled landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values