Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Configure earlier
See Arrival Final 1
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: sink rate above what the glideslope needed, off the centreline and speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,891 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 243 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Airbus A321 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at EDDC Dresden Airport, a process that took 8 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft then departed from runway 22, with a takeoff distance of 1,740 meters, which accounted for 68% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 158 knots.
As the aircraft took to the skies, it encountered local weather conditions of 29°C temperature and winds of 8 knots at 350°. The crosswind was 6 knots, while the tailwind was 5 knots. The enroute climb started 1 mile southwest of EDDC Dresden Airport, where the aircraft ascended from 1,707 feet above sea level to 34,722 feet above sea level, an increase of 33,015 feet in 20 minutes, covering a distance of 107 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began 1 mile north of Pocinovice, Czech Republic, and lasted for 3 minutes, covering 24 nautical miles. The aircraft then started its descent 1 mile southeast of Sankt Englmar, Germany, and descended from 34,757 feet above sea level to 13,511 feet above sea level, a decrease of 21,246 feet in 14 minutes, covering a distance of 92 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise resumed 3 miles west of Kreuth, Germany, and lasted for 10 minutes, covering 50 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent 2 miles south of Elmen, Austria, and descended from 13,424 feet above sea level to 2,883 feet above sea level, a decrease of 10,541 feet in 8 minutes, covering a distance of 29 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 08 at LOWI Innsbruck Airport was made from the west, with a heading of 83.0° at 2 nautical miles and 956 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 08 was successful, with a runway length of 1,891 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also good at 139 knots.
However, the touchdown speed was a little fast at 139 knots, and the touchdown rate was hard at -442 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.9 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 26°C temperature and winds of 12 knots at 150°, with a crosswind of 11 knots and a headwind of 4 knots.
The total landing distance was 861 meters, which accounted for 46% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The taxiing to the parking area from the runway took 2 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 309 nautical miles, taking 66 minutes, and the aircraft used 3,411 kilograms of fuel.
The Airbus A321 aircraft successfully landed at Innsbruck Airport (LOWI) with a score of 96.0%. The final approach was conducted from the west, heading 83.0° at 2 nautical miles and 956 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft touched down on runway 08, which has a length of 1,891 meters.
The threshold height was good, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct height as it approached the runway. The threshold speed of 139 knots was also within the acceptable range, demonstrating that the pilots had maintained control and were prepared for landing. However, the touchdown speed of 139 knots was slightly faster than ideal, which may have contributed to a harder touchdown.
The touchdown distance of 245 meters was within the acceptable range, but the touchdown rate of -442 feet per minute (fpm) was considered hard. This may have been due to the slightly fast touchdown speed. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.9 meters from the centerline, which may have required some correction during the rollout.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 26°C and a wind speed of 12 knots at 150°. The crosswind component was 11 knots, while the headwind component was 4 knots. These conditions did not appear to have significantly impacted the landing.
The total landing distance of 861 meters was 46% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the pilots had maintained control and were able to smoothly transition from landing to taxiing. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with a high score and minimal issues.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values