Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,813 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,813 m of the 2,914 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 785 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, your aircraft landing score of 89.6% is quite strong, and there are several aspects of your landing that were well executed. Your Approach Phase displayed good glideslope alignment, indicating that you were on track and aligned properly for a successful landing. This is a crucial component of safe landings, and it's great to see that you were able to maintain this throughout the approach.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, while the threshold height was above target and there was a very poor landing flare, there were still positive aspects to take note of. The touchdown rate was good, demonstrating that you were able to bring the aircraft down smoothly and safely. Additionally, although your speed was slightly above target, this can be easily adjusted for in future landings with a little more attention to detail.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown point being 364 m beyond the touchdown zone is definitely something to improve upon, as is the runway touchdown position being 7.0 m from the centerline. However, the fact that the touchdown rate was good shows that you have the skills to execute a successful landing, and with some adjustments, you'll be able to improve upon these aspects in no time.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, maintaining runway alignment is crucial for a safe and smooth landing. While being 7.0 m from the centerline is not ideal, it's definitely something that can be worked on with practice and attention to detail.
Overall, your landing was a solid effort, and with some adjustments and focus on the areas that need improvement, you have the potential to consistently achieve high scores in your landings. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for improvement in each phase of the landing process. Great job!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values