Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Track the centreline on final
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 733 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 733 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 28 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 93.7% is a solid result and demonstrates a high level of proficiency in various aspects of the landing procedure. While there were a few areas that could use improvement, there were also several positive aspects to commend.
In the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was below the glideslope limit and there was poor heading alignment. However, it is important to remember that these are areas that can be improved with practice and focus. Ensuring that the descent path is in line with the glideslope limit and maintaining proper heading alignment will help to ensure a smoother approach in future landings.
Additionally, the speed being slightly below target in the Approach Phase is a minor issue that can easily be rectified with better monitoring and adjustment of the aircraft's speed.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is great to see that the threshold height was good and the landing flare was executed perfectly. These are critical elements of a successful landing and it is encouraging to see that they were performed well in this instance.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was good and the speed was slightly above target. The touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being 9.0 m from the centreline also indicate a high level of skill and precision. These are all positive signs that the pilot is able to consistently execute a safe and accurate touchdown.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 8.1 m from the centreline is an area that could use some improvement. However, with continued practice and focus on maintaining proper alignment during the rollout phase, this aspect can also be enhanced.
Overall, the landing score of 93.7% is a commendable achievement. By addressing the areas that could use improvement, such as descent path, heading alignment and runway alignment, the pilot can continue to refine their skills and aim for even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in all aspects of aircraft operations!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values