Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 13 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,494 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 866 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 63.7% indicates there are areas that need improvement, but it is important to focus on the positives and use this as an opportunity for growth and learning. While speed was below target during the landing, it is crucial to ensure that the aircraft does not stall, so maintaining a safe speed is essential.
During the Landing Phase, it is noted that the threshold height was excessively over target, which could indicate a need for better precision and control during descent. Additionally, having a very poor landing flare and poor bank angle stability during landing suggests a need for more practice and refinement in these areas.
In the Touchdown Phase, it is positive to see that the touchdown rate was fair and speed was on target. However, it is concerning that the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone was not ideal and that the runway touchdown position was 18.3 m from the centreline. Furthermore, landing with a 6 kn tailwind is a significant risk factor and should be avoided in future landings.
In the Rollout Phase, having the runway alignment 20.9 m from the centreline indicates a need for better control and coordination during this phase of the landing.
In conclusion, while there were some areas of concern in this landing, it is important to view this as a learning opportunity and to use it as motivation to improve and refine skills for future landings. Remember to prioritize safety and precision in all aspects of the landing process. Keep practicing and seeking feedback to continue to improve and strive for better scores in future landings. You have the potential to achieve great results with dedication and perseverance. Keep up the good work!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values