Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 5.2 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed below the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,667 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 380 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 11 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft then departed from runway 21 at EDFH Frankfurt-Hahn Airport, with a takeoff distance of 1,262 meters, which accounted for 39% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 159 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions of 10°C temperature and a wind speed of 8 knots at 240°. The crosswind was 3 knots, while the headwind was 7 knots. The enroute climb started overhead Lautzenhausen, a town in Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany, and involved a significant increase in altitude from 2,655 feet above sea level to 35,556 feet above sea level, a rise of 32,901 feet in 18 minutes and covering a distance of 87 nautical miles.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 2 miles north-east of Andenne, a town in Wallonia, Belgium. This phase lasted for 34 minutes and covered a distance of 230 nautical miles. The enroute descent then began overhead Cotton End, a town in Bedford, England, and involved a decrease in altitude from 35,662 feet above sea level to 1,962 feet above sea level, a drop of 33,700 feet in 27 minutes and covering a distance of 111 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 32 at EGNM Leeds Bradford Airport was made from the south-east, with a heading of 318.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,285 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 32 was successful, with a touchdown distance of 381 meters, which was 64% of the runway length. The touchdown speed was 127 knots, and the touchdown rate was fair at -211 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the runway rollout alignment was also perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 6°C temperature and a wind speed of 7 knots at 310°. The crosswind was 1 knot, while the headwind was 7 knots. The total landing distance was 1,064 meters, and the total flight distance was 436 nautical miles, which was covered in 90 minutes. The aircraft used 3,279 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The aircraft, identified as B38M, successfully landed at EGNM Leeds Bradford Airport, demonstrating a high level of proficiency in its approach and landing procedures. The final approach was conducted from the south east, aligning with the runway 32 threshold at a heading of 318.0° and at a distance of 4 nautical miles (nm) from the airport. At an altitude of 1,285 feet above ground level (agl), the aircraft maintained a steady course, showcasing its ability to navigate through the local airspace.
Upon reaching the runway threshold, the aircraft touched down smoothly, with a threshold speed of 132 knots (kt) being well within the acceptable range. The touchdown distance of 381 meters was also satisfactory, indicating that the aircraft had maintained control and stability throughout the landing process. The touchdown speed of 127 kt was slightly below the threshold speed, which is a desirable outcome as it reduces the risk of overrunning the runway.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 6°C and a wind speed of 7 kt from a direction of 310°. This resulted in a crosswind of 1 kt and a headwind of 7 kt, which the aircraft successfully managed to counteract. The touchdown rate of -211 feet per minute (fpm) was fair, indicating that the aircraft had a slight tendency to sink upon touchdown. However, this was not a significant concern, and the aircraft maintained its alignment with the runway.
The total landing distance of 1,064 meters was 64% of the runway length, which is a reasonable outcome considering the local weather conditions. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, demonstrating that the aircraft had maintained control and stability throughout the landing process. Overall, the landing was a success, with the aircraft demonstrating a high level of proficiency in its approach and landing procedures.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values