Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,202 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 689 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 89.7% indicates a strong performance during most phases of the landing procedure. However, there are some areas that require improvement to achieve a higher score in the future.
In the Approach Phase, the descent path below the glideslope limit is concerning as it can lead to a harder touchdown and potentially a runway overrun. It is important for pilots to closely monitor their descent profile and make adjustments as needed to ensure a safe and smooth landing.
During the Landing Phase, the slightly high threshold height and very poor landing flare suggest that the pilot may need to focus on better judgment and timing when approaching the runway. Proper technique and coordination are key to achieving a smooth and controlled touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, the very hard touchdown rate and slightly above target speed indicate a need for more precision and finesse during the landing. Additionally, landing 278 m beyond the designated touchdown zone is a significant deviation that should be avoided in future landings.
It is commendable that the runway touchdown position was very good, despite landing with a 7 kn tailwind. However, it is important for pilots to be mindful of wind conditions and make necessary adjustments to ensure a safe and stable landing.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the very good runway alignment demonstrates good control and consistency in maintaining the aircraft on the centerline of the runway. This discipline should be carried forward into future landings to ensure safe and efficient taxiing and parking.
Overall, while there were some areas for improvement identified in this particular landing, it is important to view this score as an opportunity for growth and learning. By focusing on these key areas and practicing good airmanship, pilots can continue to improve their skills and achieve even higher landing scores in the future. Keep up the good work and continue striving for excellence in all phases of flight!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values