Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 5 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
In the last part of the flare, hold a little more back pressure to fully arrest the sink before the mains touch down.
What happened: Threshold speed and height were within limits, and the flare began on time and arrested the sink normally; even so, the touchdown rate was 214 fpm, a firm touchdown.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a smooth, gentle rate at touchdown
There are several things that can go wrong during the flare, carrying too much speed over the threshold, starting the flare at the wrong height and inconsistent flight control inputs, all contribute to a poor flare resulting in a hard touchdown or a float down the runway.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,098 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 536 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport in Dhaka, Bangladesh, the Boeing 737-600 began its journey on runway 14. After a taxiing period of six minutes and covering 2 nautical miles, the aircraft took to the skies, accelerating down the runway at a takeoff distance of 1,152 meters, which accounted for 43% of the available runway length. Liftoff speed was achieved at 141 knots, with a local temperature of 31 degrees Celsius and a gentle headwind of 3 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to its enroute cruise altitude, it traversed a significant distance, increasing its altitude from 1,026 feet above sea level to 40,007 feet in 37 minutes, covering 254 nautical miles. The climb phase was followed by a prolonged level cruise, which lasted 139 minutes and spanned 963 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent, initially from 39,997 feet to 28,081 feet in 24 minutes, covering 178 nautical miles. This was followed by a series of short level cruises and descents, with the final descent commencing 7 miles west of Hulbuk, Tajikistan, and terminating at 6,824 feet above sea level.
The Boeing 737-600 finally touched down on runway 09 at Dushanbe Airport, Tajikistan, with a touchdown speed of 117 knots and a touchdown rate of -163 feet per minute. The aircraft's landing distance of 1,000 meters accounted for 37% of the available runway length, and the runway rollout alignment was perfect. Following a taxiing period of one minute, the aircraft came to a stop, having completed a total flight distance of 1,504 nautical miles in 227 minutes, with a fuel consumption of 9,737 kilograms.
The Boeing 737-600 touched down on runway 09 at UTDD Dushanbe Airport with a high degree of precision, achieving a threshold height that met the required standards. The aircraft's approach quality was excellent, with a threshold speed of 125 kt, which was well within the acceptable range. As the aircraft descended onto the runway, it maintained a steady state, with a touchdown speed of 117 kt, which was also within the desired parameters. The touchdown rate of -163 fpm was good, indicating a controlled and smooth touchdown.
The touchdown point was 116 m beyond the touchdown zone, which, although not ideal, was still within the acceptable limits. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, with the aircraft maintaining its centerline alignment throughout the touchdown phase. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 23 °C and a light wind of 2 kt at 10 °, contributed to a stable and predictable approach. The crosswind component was minimal, with a headwind of 0 kt, further enhancing the approach quality.
The aircraft's rollout was flawless, with perfect alignment on the centerline. The total landing distance of 1,000 m, which accounted for 37% of the runway length, was within the acceptable range. Overall, the landing was a success, with a score of 99.0% reflecting the high level of precision and control demonstrated by the pilot. The combination of good approach quality, controlled touchdown, and smooth rollout resulted in a safe and efficient landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values