Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 5.3 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Hold the aim point and wait for the speed to bleed before raising the nose, starting the flare within the normal band instead of 84 ft.
What happened: The flare began at 84 ft, 39 ft earlier than the normal band.
Watch for: Radio altimeter: start the flare within the normal flare band
See Arrival Landing
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: sink rate above what the glideslope needed and off the runway's 3° glideslope.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,587 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 503 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 11 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, an Airbus A350-1000, then departed from runway 27 at LEZL Sevilla Airport in Andalusia, Spain. The takeoff distance was 1,375 meters, which accounted for 41% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 158 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions with a temperature of 19°C and wind speeds of 16 knots at 229°. The crosswind was 10 knots, and the headwind was 12 knots. After departing from Sevilla Airport, the aircraft began its enroute climb, which started overhead the airport and reached an altitude of 36,055 feet above sea level. The climb from 1,085 feet to 36,055 feet took 23 minutes and covered a distance of 149 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started 2 miles east of Zujar, Andalusia, and lasted for 22 minutes, covering a distance of 191 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another enroute climb, this time from 35,459 feet to 36,175 feet, which took 2 minutes and covered 14 nautical miles. The climb started 16 miles southwest of Es Cubells, Comunitat Autonoma de les Illes Balears, Spain.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered another level cruise, which started 5 miles west of La Savina, Comunitat Autonoma de les Illes Balears, and lasted for 5 minutes, covering 43 nautical miles. The enroute descent started 30 miles east of Sant Carles de Peralta, Comunitat Autonoma de les Illes Balears, and took 11 minutes to descend from 36,106 feet to 2,153 feet above sea level, covering a distance of 54 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise, which started 1 mile southeast of Sencelles, Comunitat Autonoma de les Illes Balears, and lasted for 6 minutes, covering 5 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 24L at LEPA Palma de Mallorca Airport was made from the northeast, heading 239.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,792 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 24L was successful, with a touchdown point 86 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 134 knots, which was a little fast, and the touchdown rate was fair at -286 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.9 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 16°C and wind speeds of 16 knots at 259°, with a crosswind of 6 knots and a headwind of 15 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,278 meters, which accounted for 49% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good. After landing, the aircraft took 4 minutes to taxi to the parking, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 465 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 84 minutes. The aircraft used 10,485 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A350-1000 successfully landed at LEPA Palma de Mallorca Airport, achieving a score of 94.4%. The aircraft approached the runway from the north east, heading 239.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,792 feet above ground level (agl). The pilot maintained a good threshold height, which is a crucial aspect of a safe landing.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft landed on runway 24L, which has a length of 2,587 meters. The threshold speed was satisfactory at 133 knots, indicating that the pilot had properly managed the aircraft's descent and speed. However, the touchdown point was 86 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was slightly higher than ideal at 134 knots. This resulted in a fair touchdown rate of -286 feet per minute (fpm).
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.9 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to the crosswind or pilot error. The local weather conditions were favorable, with a temperature of 16°C and wind speeds of 16 knots at 259°. The crosswind component was relatively low at 6 knots, while the headwind component was 15 knots, which helped to stabilize the aircraft during landing.
The total landing distance was 1,278 meters, accounting for 49% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the pilot had effectively managed the aircraft's speed and descent. The runway rollout alignment was excellent, demonstrating the pilot's skill and control during the landing phase.
Overall, the landing was successful, with the pilot achieving a high score of 94.4%. However, there were some minor issues with the touchdown point and speed, which could be addressed through further training and practice.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values