Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,705 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,705 m of the 2,233 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 551 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
First of all, congratulations on achieving an aircraft landing score of 85.4%! This is a commendable result, and it shows that you are on the right track towards improving your landing technique.
Let's break down the analysis of the different phases of the landing to see where improvements can be made:
Approach Phase: The poor descent path below the glideslope limit indicates that there was a deviation from the ideal descent profile during the approach. It is important to maintain proper altitude control to ensure a smooth and stable descent towards the runway.
Landing Phase: The threshold height being excessively below the target suggests that the aircraft descended too early before reaching the runway threshold. Additionally, having a very poor landing flare indicates that the transition from descent to touchdown was not properly executed. Working on timing and coordination during this phase can lead to better landing outcomes.
Touchdown Phase: Although the touchdown rate was perfect, the speed being slightly above the target and touchdown point being 139m beyond the touchdown zone indicates the need for better speed and distance management. Additionally, the runway touchdown position being 3.4m from the centerline suggests the need for more precise alignment during touchdown.
Rollout Phase: Finally, the runway alignment being 4.9m from the centerline during the rollout phase highlights the importance of maintaining proper alignment with the runway centerline throughout the landing rollout.
Overall, while there are areas for improvement in each phase of the landing, it is important to acknowledge the strengths, such as the perfect touchdown rate. By focusing on fine-tuning your techniques, paying attention to altitude and speed control, and practicing precise runway alignment, you can further enhance your landing performance and strive for even better scores in the future. Keep up the great work and continue to strive for excellence in your aircraft landings. Happy flying!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values