Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Roll the wings level with aileron and hold bank within limits as you establish the climb.
What happened: Bank increased to 2.3° during the initial climb, and wings stayed over-banked at 16° into the next climb segment.
Watch for: Attitude indicator bank angle, aiming to keep it near wings-level
Arrival
Begin raising the nose earlier, as soon as you reach 11 ft, rather than waiting until closer to the runway.
What happened: The flare began at 6.5 ft, 4.7 ft later than the normal band, leaving little time to arrest the sink. A late flare like this usually carries through to a firmer-than-normal touchdown.
Watch for: Radio altimeter against the normal flare band, calling the flare at 11 ft.
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed below the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: speed below the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,935 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,935 m of the 3,986 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 698 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight on the Airbus A320 from EIDW Dublin Airport to EDDM Munich Airport was smooth and efficient. The taxi from the parking to the runway was quick, taking only 4 minutes to cover less than 1 nm. The departure roll on runway 28R at Dublin Airport was successful, with a takeoff distance of 2,162 m and a liftoff speed of 165 kt. The local weather in Dublin was 17 °C.
Once in the air, the climb to 38,860 ft took 32 minutes and covered 201 nm. The level cruise over Lincolnshire, England lasted 55 minutes and covered 413 nm. The descent to Munich Airport from 38,988 ft to 2,534 ft took 28 minutes and covered 144 nm.
The final approach to runway 26R at Munich Airport was from the east at 4 nm and 1,055 ft agl. The landing on runway 26R was successful, with a slight deviation in threshold speed but a good touchdown speed of 125 kt and a fair touchdown rate of -224 fpm. The touchdown point was slightly beyond the touchdown zone, and the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 12.1 m from the centerline. The local weather in Munich was 20 °C.
The total landing distance was 1,848 m, which was 46% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 27.9 m from the centerline. The taxi from the runway to the parking took 3 minutes to cover less than 1 nm.
Overall, the flight covered a distance of 766 nm, took 124 minutes, and used 4,517 kg of fuel. The flight was a success with minor deviations in touchdown speed and alignment that did not affect the safety of the operation.
The Airbus A320 aircraft successfully landed on runway 26R at EDDM Munich Airport, achieving an overall score of 80.6%. The final approach was initiated from the east, heading 263.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,055 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft successfully touched down on the runway, with a threshold speed that was slightly below the target at 130 knots.
The touchdown point was located 278 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which indicates a slight deviation from the intended landing spot. However, the touchdown speed of 125 knots was within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate of -224 feet per minute (fpm) was fair. The runway touchdown position was also misaligned by 12.1 meters from the centerline, which may have contributed to the deviation from the intended landing spot.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 20°C. The total landing distance of 1,848 meters was 46% of the available runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the runway length of 3,986 meters. However, the runway rollout alignment was misaligned by 27.9 meters from the centerline, which may have affected the aircraft's ability to maintain a straight course during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was successful, but there were some deviations from the intended landing spot and rollout alignment. These deviations may be addressed through further training and practice to improve the aircraft's performance and safety.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values