Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Apply small rudder corrections against a point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline during the roll.
What happened: The aircraft tracked 9 m off the runway centreline during the ground roll, and flights with this pattern usually carry extra bank, around 3.2°, into the first climb.
Watch for: Heading indicator: wings level, tracking the runway centreline
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 in the score
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate for a circuit: seven checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate is an instrument-approach check and does not apply.
At the 500 ft gate: no landing flap set and wings not level.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,230 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,230 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 392 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Reichelsheim Airfield (EDFB), the Bonanza G36 began its takeoff roll on runway 36, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 84 kt in a distance of 423 m, which accounted for 34% of the available runway length. The local weather conditions at the time were characterized by a temperature of 8 °C and a moderate wind blowing at 10 kt from 285°, resulting in a 10 kt crosswind component and a 3 kt headwind component.
As the aircraft entered the left-hand traffic pattern, it demonstrated a swift and efficient turn, covering a distance of less than 1 nm in 20 seconds. The subsequent downwind leg, which spanned 3 nm, was completed in 65 seconds, with the aircraft maintaining a steady heading and altitude. The base leg turn, executed at an angle of 42.2° to the runway, was followed by a short base leg, during which the aircraft descended to a height of 903 ft above ground level (agl) and aligned itself with the runway. The final approach was made from the south, with the aircraft maintaining a steady heading of 358.0° and a speed that was well above the target threshold speed of 89 kt.
The Bonanza G36 touched down on runway 36 at EDFB, with a touchdown distance of 393 m, which was within the acceptable range. However, the touchdown speed of 74 kt was slightly higher than desired, and the touchdown rate of -161 fpm was good. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, but the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 12.2 m from the centreline. The total landing distance was 619 m, accounting for 50% of the available runway length. The aircraft used 4 kg of fuel for the entire flight, which covered a distance of 11 nm and took approximately 5 minutes to complete.
The Bonanza G36 touched down on runway 36 at EDFB Reichelsheim Airfield, demonstrating a satisfactory approach quality. The aircraft descended from 903 ft agl to 63 ft agl at the threshold, exceeding the target height. The threshold speed of 89 kt was significantly above the target, indicating a high degree of control and precision.
As the aircraft made contact with the runway, it exhibited a touchdown speed of 74 kt, which was slightly faster than desired. However, the touchdown rate of -161 fpm was within acceptable limits. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with the aircraft centered on the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 8 °C and a headwind of 4 kt, contributed to a relatively smooth landing.
The Bonanza G36 rolled out along the runway, covering a total distance of 619 m, which accounted for 50% of the runway length. Although the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 12.2 m from the centreline, the overall performance was satisfactory. The landing score of 88.8% reflects a good overall performance, with some minor areas for improvement.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values