Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Configure earlier
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: off the runway's 3° glideslope.
At the 500 ft gate: off the runway's 3° glideslope.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 7,500 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 2,003 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft then departed from runway 10 at KECG Elizabeth City Regional Airport & Coast Guard Air Station, with a takeoff distance of 2,738 feet, which accounted for 38% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 142 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions with a temperature of 61°F and a wind speed of 2 knots at 270°. The crosswind was negligible, while the tailwind was 2 knots. The enroute climb started 1 mile east of KECG Elizabeth City Regional Airport, where the aircraft climbed from 1,408 feet above sea level to 15,011 feet above sea level, an increase of 13,603 feet in 6 minutes, covering a distance of 28 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began 3 miles south of NC01 Harvey Point Defense Testing Activity Airport Hertford, and lasted for 18 minutes, covering a distance of 127 nautical miles. The enroute descent started 2 miles northwest of Bunnlevel, where the aircraft descended from 14,830 feet above sea level to 1,664 feet above sea level, a decrease of 13,166 feet in 11 minutes, covering a distance of 46 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 05R at KRDU Raleigh Durham International Airport was made from the southwest, with a heading of 45.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,252 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 05R was successful, with a total landing distance of 3,615 feet, which accounted for 48% of the runway. The touchdown point was 616 feet beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was slightly fast at 109 knots.
The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 36 feet from the centreline, and the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 40 feet from the centreline. The local weather conditions during landing were a temperature of 59°F and a wind speed of 2 knots at 269°, with a crosswind of 1 knot and a tailwind of 1 knot. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took less than 1 minute and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 209 nautical miles, which was covered in 42 minutes, and the aircraft used 5,740 pounds of fuel during the flight.
Aircraft C750 successfully landed on runway 05R at KRDU Raleigh Durham International Airport, achieving a score of 93.1%. The final approach was initiated from the southwest, heading 45.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,252 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft maintained a good threshold height, which is a crucial aspect of a safe landing.
Upon touchdown, the threshold speed was slightly below the target at 114 knots, indicating a controlled descent. However, the touchdown speed of 109 knots was a little fast, which may have contributed to a slightly longer landing distance. The touchdown rate was smooth at -146 feet per minute (fpm), suggesting a well-executed landing.
Despite the smooth touchdown rate, the aircraft's touchdown point was 616 feet beyond the touchdown zone, which may indicate a slight overcorrection or a slightly fast approach speed. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 36 feet from the centreline, which could have been caused by a slight deviation in the approach path or a minor issue with the aircraft's navigation system.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 59°F and a wind speed of 2 knots at 269°. The crosswind and tailwind components were minimal, at 1 knot each, which suggests that the aircraft was not significantly affected by wind during the landing.
The total landing distance was 3,615 feet, which is 48% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, considering the aircraft's weight and the runway length. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 40 feet from the centreline, which may indicate a minor issue with the aircraft's braking system or a slight deviation in the rollout path.
Overall, the landing was successful, and the aircraft scored well. However, there are some minor issues that need to be addressed, such as the slightly fast touchdown speed and the misaligned touchdown and rollout positions. These issues can be corrected through adjustments to the approach path, navigation system, and braking system.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values