Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 7.7 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,695 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 673 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 8 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The Airbus A319 then departed from runway 22R at EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport, with a takeoff distance of 1,298 meters, which accounted for 43% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 152 knots.
As the aircraft took to the skies, it encountered local weather conditions of 24°C temperature and a wind speed of 18 knots at 280°. The crosswind was 15 knots, while the headwind was 9 knots. The enroute climb began 2 miles south of Tarnby, where the aircraft ascended from 1,110 feet above sea level to 13,986 feet above sea level, an increase of 12,876 feet in 9 minutes, covering a distance of 32 nautical miles.
After reaching the desired altitude, the enroute descent started 1 mile east of Liseleje, where the aircraft descended from 13,894 feet above sea level to 2,580 feet above sea level, a decrease of 11,313 feet in 9 minutes, covering a distance of 34 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise began 11 miles south east of Grenaa and lasted for 4 minutes, covering a distance of 11 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its final approach to runway 28L at EKAH Aarhus Airport from the east, heading 280.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,163 feet above ground level. The landing was executed on runway 28L, which had a length of 2,695 meters. The threshold height was good, but the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 137 knots.
The touchdown point was 249 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was 132 knots, which was a little fast. The touchdown rate was fair at -282 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.1 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 17°C temperature and a wind speed of 22 knots at 280°, with a crosswind of 0 knots and a headwind of 22 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,148 meters, which accounted for 43% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The total flight distance was 85 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 29 minutes. The aircraft used 1,733 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A319 aircraft successfully landed at EKAH Aarhus Airport, achieving a score of 93.8%. The final approach to runway 28L was initiated from the east, heading 280.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,163 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's approach was characterized by a good threshold height, indicating a stable and controlled descent.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's threshold speed was slightly above the target speed of 137 knots, which may have contributed to a slightly faster touchdown speed of 132 knots. However, the touchdown rate of -282 feet per minute (fpm) was considered fair, suggesting that the aircraft's descent was not excessively steep. The touchdown point was located 249 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which may indicate a slight over-shooting of the intended landing spot.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.1 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's approach path. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 17°C and a wind speed of 22 knots from a direction of 280°. The crosswind component was negligible, while the headwind component was 22 knots, which may have contributed to the aircraft's slightly faster touchdown speed.
The total landing distance of 1,148 meters was 43% of the available runway length of 2,695 meters, which is a relatively short landing distance. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft's brakes were applied smoothly and effectively, and the aircraft was brought to a stop in a controlled manner. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score despite a few minor deviations from the ideal landing parameters.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values