Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,555 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 414 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 85.8% is a decent result, but there are definitely areas that can be improved upon in each phase of the landing process.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is important to ensure that the descent path is within the glideslope limit to avoid being too high above the correct approach angle. Additionally, maintaining the appropriate speed during this phase is crucial for a smooth transition into the Landing Phase.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is noted that the threshold height was above target and the landing flare was poor. Improving these aspects can help with a smoother touchdown and reduce the risk of a hard landing.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was good, but the speed was slightly above target. However, it is positive to see that the touchdown distance was within the touchdown zone, indicating good spatial awareness during this phase. It is also worth noting that the runway touchdown position was slightly off centerline, which can be improved with better alignment during approach.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, it is important to focus on maintaining proper runway alignment to ensure a straight and smooth rollout after touchdown. Being 9.3 m from the centerline indicates room for improvement in this area.
In conclusion, while a score of 85.8% is respectable, there are clear areas for improvement in each phase of the landing process. By addressing these specific issues and practicing proper techniques, the overall landing performance can be further improved. Keep up the hard work and continue striving for excellence in every landing!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values