Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 17 ft off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 15 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 15 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 15 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 in the score
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate for a circuit: seven checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate is an instrument-approach check and does not apply.
At the 1,000 ft gate: no landing flap set, off the centreline, wings not level and speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 12,001 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 1,362 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft, a Kodiak 100, taxiing from the parking area to the runway at KXTA Homey (Area 51) Airport. This process took 4 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. Upon reaching the runway, the aircraft departed from runway 15L, with a takeoff distance of 738 feet, which accounted for 6% of the runway's length. The liftoff speed was 73 knots.
As the aircraft entered the local airspace, it encountered a temperature of 53°F and a wind speed of 10 knots at 77°. The crosswind was 10 knots, while the headwind was 2 knots. The aircraft then proceeded to follow a right-hand pattern entry from runway 15L, covering a distance of 1 nautical mile in 20 seconds.
The right-hand pattern crosswind was navigated in 8 seconds, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then entered the pattern downwind turn, covering a distance of 1 nautical mile at an angle of 79.7° to the runway. The downwind leg itself covered a distance of 5 nautical miles in 98 seconds.
The base leg turn was navigated at an angle of 21.8° to the runway, covering a distance of 4 nautical miles. The base leg itself was covered in less than 1 nautical mile in 10 seconds. The final turn was completed in 36 seconds, covering a distance of 1 nautical mile.
The final approach to runway 15L was made from the north, heading 163.0° at an altitude of 812 feet above ground level (agl) and a distance of 2 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was made on runway 15L, which had a length of 12,001 feet. The threshold height was well above the target, and the threshold speed was excessively high at 94 knots.
The touchdown point was 397 feet beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 85 knots, which was also excessively fast. However, the touchdown rate was good at -159 feet per minute (fpm). The runway touchdown alignment was very good. The local weather conditions during landing were a temperature of 54°F and a wind speed of 11 knots at 74°, with a crosswind of 11 knots and a headwind of 1 knot.
The total landing distance was 2,966 feet, which accounted for 25% of the runway's length. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 25 feet from the centreline. The aircraft then taxied to the parking area from the runway, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile in 3 minutes.
The total flight distance was 16 nautical miles, which was covered in 10 minutes, and the aircraft used 48 pounds of fuel during the flight.
The aircraft in question, a Kodiak 100, successfully landed at KXTA Homey (Area 51) Airport, but with some notable areas for improvement. The final approach was initiated from the north, heading 163.0° at 2 nautical miles and 812 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft touched down on runway 15L, which has a length of 12,001 feet.
However, there were some discrepancies in the landing performance. The threshold height at 76 feet agl was significantly above the target, indicating that the aircraft may have been too high during the approach. Additionally, the threshold speed was excessively high at 94 knots, which could have contributed to the high touchdown speed. The touchdown point was 397 feet beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was 85 knots, which is also considered excessively fast.
On a positive note, the touchdown rate was good at -159 feet per minute (fpm), and the runway touchdown alignment was very good. The local weather conditions were also favorable, with a temperature of 54°F and a wind of 11 knots at 74°. The crosswind was 11 knots, and the headwind was 1 knot, which may have contributed to the high touchdown speed.
The total landing distance was 2,966 feet, which is 25% of the runway length. While this is not excessively long, it does indicate that the aircraft may have been able to stop more quickly if the touchdown speed had been lower. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 25 feet from the centreline, which may have been due to the high touchdown speed or other factors.
Overall, while the landing was successful, there are some areas for improvement, particularly in terms of reducing the touchdown speed and improving the threshold height. With some adjustments to the approach and landing technique, the pilot may be able to achieve a more optimal landing performance.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values