Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach angle
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,768 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,768 m of the 2,982 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 471 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 5 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, an Airbus A320, then departed from runway 36 at LIMF Turin Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,686 meters, which accounted for 76% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 150 knots.
As the aircraft took to the skies, it encountered local weather conditions of 24°C temperature and a wind speed of 2 knots at 139°. The crosswind and tailwind components were both 2 knots. The enroute climb started approximately 1 mile northeast of San Maurizio, Italy, and the aircraft climbed from an altitude of 2,122 feet above sea level to 37,008 feet above sea level, an increase of 34,886 feet in 24 minutes, covering a distance of 159 nautical miles.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which began approximately 1 mile east of Castello d'Argile, Italy. This phase lasted for 103 minutes and covered a distance of 777 nautical miles. The enroute descent started approximately 1 mile southwest of LTAM Kayseri Airport Develi, Turkey, and the aircraft descended from 36,978 feet above sea level to 1,688 feet above sea level, a decrease of 35,290 feet in 24 minutes, covering a distance of 88 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 28R at LTFE Milas Bodrum International Airport was made from the east, with a heading of 286.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,659 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 28R was successful, with a total landing distance of 1,683 meters, which accounted for 56% of the runway. The threshold height was slightly above the target, while the threshold speed was slightly below the target at 124 knots.
The touchdown point was 51 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 121 knots and a firm touchdown rate of -333 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the runway rollout alignment was very good. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 21°C temperature and a wind speed of 6 knots at 270°, with a crosswind component of 2 knots and a headwind component of 6 knots.
The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 5 minutes and covered 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,033 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 163 minutes and a fuel consumption of 6,406 kilograms.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at LTFE Milas Bodrum International Airport, achieving a high score of 95.3%. The aircraft approached the runway from the east, heading 286.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,659 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was made to runway 28R, which has a length of 2,982 meters.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down 51 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is slightly outside the target area. However, the touchdown speed of 121 knots was within the acceptable range, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. The touchdown rate of -333 feet per minute (fpm) was firm, suggesting a stable and controlled landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 21°C and a gentle headwind of 6 knots from a direction of 270°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, which contributed to a stable and controlled approach. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway centerline.
The total landing distance of 1,683 meters was 56% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. This suggests that the pilot executed a well-planned and controlled approach, taking into account the aircraft's performance and the runway's characteristics. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating that the aircraft maintained its alignment with the runway centerline during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was executed smoothly and safely, with the aircraft touching down within a reasonable distance from the touchdown zone. The high score of 95.3% reflects the pilot's skill and experience in executing a controlled and stable approach, as well as the aircraft's performance in the given weather conditions.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values