Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 30 stages, 28 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,826 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 82 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
First and foremost, congratulations on achieving a commendable landing score of 94.6%! This score reflects a high level of skill and proficiency in handling the aircraft during various phases of landing.
Let's delve into the detailed analysis of the landing phases. In the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was slightly below the glideslope limit and the speed was a bit below the target. While there is room for improvement in maintaining the descent path and speed, it is important to acknowledge that these aspects did not significantly impact the overall landing score.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is highlighted that the threshold height was good and the landing flare was executed well. However, there was a noted issue with poor bank angle stability during landing. It is advisable to focus on improving bank angle control to enhance overall landing stability and precision.
In the Touchdown Phase, it is observed that the touchdown rate was slightly hard, although the speed was on target. Additionally, the touchdown distance fell within the touchdown zone, which is a positive indicator. The runway touchdown position being 11.0 m from the centerline suggests room for improvement in aligning the aircraft more accurately during touchdown.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was noted to be 10.1 m from the centerline. This aspect can be improved by ensuring more precise alignment while taxiing down the runway.
Overall, the analysis highlights areas of strength and areas for improvement in different phases of the landing process. By focusing on enhancing descent path control, bank angle stability, touchdown rate, and runway alignment, you can further refine your landing skills and aim for even higher scores in the future. Keep practicing and refining your techniques, and you will continue to excel in your aircraft landings. Well done on your impressive performance!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values