Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 6.1 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Apply steady, continuous back pressure through the flare to arrest the sink smoothly and hold the normal profile, rather than letting it drift.
What happened: The flare did not hold its target profile, with the sink most arrested at 1.5 ft, and this flight then touched down at 257 fpm of sink - a firm arrival. An unsettled flare profile like this usually carries through to a firmer touchdown.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a smooth, steadily decreasing sink rate through the flare to touchdown.
There are several things that can go wrong during the flare, carrying too much speed over the threshold, starting the flare at the wrong height and inconsistent flight control inputs, all contribute to a poor flare resulting in a hard touchdown or a float down the runway.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,772 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,772 m of the 3,496 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 478 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Charles de Gaulle International Airport's runway 08L, the Airbus A320 began its journey with a taxiing period of 8 minutes, covering 2 nautical miles to reach the runway. At 11 °C and with a wind of 11 kt at 30 °, the aircraft took off, utilizing 53% of the 1,900-meter runway to achieve liftoff at a speed of 163 kt.
As the aircraft climbed to 34,982 feet above sea level, it traversed 115 nautical miles in 18 minutes, increasing its altitude by 33,816 feet. The enroute level cruise phase began 3 miles west of Cerdon, lasting 22 minutes and covering 164 nautical miles. Subsequent descent phases took the aircraft from 34,984 feet to 8,008 feet above sea level, and then from 8,007 feet to 1,740 feet above sea level, with the final descent phase lasting 7 minutes and covering 24 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 32L at Toulouse-Blagnac Airport from the southeast, aligning itself with the runway at 4 nautical miles and 1,237 feet above ground level.
The Airbus A320 landed on runway 32L, utilizing 48% of the 3,501-meter runway, with a touchdown point 67 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was slightly fast at 136 kt, but the runway touchdown alignment was very good. The aircraft taxied to the parking area in 7 minutes, covering 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 404 nautical miles, taking 79 minutes, and the aircraft used 2,972 kilograms of fuel.
The aircraft touched down on runway 32L at LFBO Toulouse-Blagnac Airport, a 3,501-meter-long runway, with a threshold speed of 139 knots, which was within the acceptable range. The approach quality was good, with a final approach to the runway from the south east, heading 323.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,237 feet above ground level. The threshold height was satisfactory, allowing for a smooth touchdown.
The touchdown point was 67 meters beyond the touchdown zone, indicating a slight overrun. However, the touchdown speed of 136 knots was a little fast, resulting in a firm touchdown rate of -307 feet per minute. Despite this, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, demonstrating precise control during the landing phase. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 16°C, did not pose any significant challenges to the landing.
The total landing distance of 1,697 meters, which accounted for 48% of the runway length, was within the acceptable range. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating that the aircraft remained centered on the runway during the rollout phase. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 99.0%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values