Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 30 stages, 29 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,566 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,566 m of the 3,286 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 529 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
While the aircraft landing score of 76.1% may not be as high as desired, there are still areas of improvement to focus on. Firstly, let's address the issues identified in each phase of the landing process.
In the Approach Phase, it was noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit and speed was higher than the target. To improve this phase, pilots should focus on maintaining a stable descent path and keeping the speed within the desired range. This can help ensure a smoother transition into the Landing Phase.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the threshold height was above the target and there was a very poor landing flare. To address these issues, pilots should work on achieving the correct threshold height and practicing proper landing flare techniques to ensure a smoother touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was hard, speed was above target, and the touchdown point was beyond the designated zone. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was off-center. To improve this phase, pilots should focus on achieving a softer touchdown, maintaining the target speed, and ensuring a precise touchdown within the designated zone and centerline of the runway.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was off-center. To address this issue, pilots should concentrate on maintaining proper runway alignment to ensure a straight rollout after touchdown.
Overall, while there may be room for improvement in various phases of the landing process, it is essential to recognize these areas for growth and actively work on refining skills and techniques. By focusing on proper descent, flare, touchdown, and rollout procedures, pilots can strive for a more precise and successful landing experience. Remember, with practice and dedication, progress and improvement are always within reach.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values