Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the nose up sooner to lift off at 155 kt instead of letting speed build on the ground.
What happened: The aircraft lifted off at 172 kt, 17 kt above the target liftoff speed.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 155 kt at liftoff
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Keep the back pressure coming once the flare is established, holding the nose up through to touchdown instead of easing it.
What happened: The flare arrested the sink but 235 fpm of it came back before touchdown, and in flights like this one that returning sink usually carries through to a firm or hard touchdown at 312 fpm.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: the sink held near zero all the way through touchdown, not allowed to build back up.
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 26 stages, 24 in the score
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,553 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,553 m of the 3,499 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 732 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 777-200ER, then departed from runway 07L at Los Angeles International Airport (KLAX). The takeoff distance was 1,811 meters, which was 53% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 172 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of Los Angeles, it encountered local weather conditions of 22°C temperature and a 3-knot tailwind. The enroute climb started 1 mile west of Lennox, California, and the aircraft climbed from 1,113 feet above sea level to 34,010 feet above sea level, an increase of 32,897 feet in 22 minutes, covering a distance of 142 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started 5 miles east of Atascadero, California, and lasted for 183 minutes, covering a distance of 1,437 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another climb, this time from 34,313 feet to 35,864 feet above sea level, an increase of 1,551 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 14 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise continued, starting at a new location with coordinates 39.1145494° N and 150.8122696° W, and lasted for 197 minutes, covering a distance of 1,540 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another climb, this time from 36,485 feet to 37,953 feet above sea level, an increase of 1,468 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 11 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise continued, starting at a new location with coordinates 36.7349292° N and 176.3534047° E, and lasted for 204 minutes, covering a distance of 1,395 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another climb, this time from 37,950 feet to 39,951 feet above sea level, an increase of 2,000 feet in 3 minutes, covering a distance of 25 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise continued, starting at a new location with coordinates 35.2507031° N and 147.0435305° E, and lasted for 78 minutes, covering a distance of 555 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent, starting 4 miles south of Shingu, Japan, and descended from 39,225 feet to 10,073 feet above sea level, a decrease of 29,153 feet in 12 minutes, covering a distance of 70 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise continued, starting at a new location 10 miles south of Anan, Japan, and lasted for 6 minutes, covering a distance of 28 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent, starting 8 miles northwest of Ishii, Japan, and descended from 10,084 feet to 1,288 feet above sea level, a decrease of 8,795 feet in 12 minutes, covering a distance of 43 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 06R at Kansai International Airport (RJBB) was made from the southwest, heading 51.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,258 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 06R, which was 3,499 meters long. The threshold height was slightly above target, but the threshold speed was good at 134 knots.
The touchdown point was 314 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was 126 knots, which was good. The touchdown rate was firm at -353 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, and the runway
The Boeing 777-200ER aircraft successfully landed at RJBB Kansai International Airport, achieving a high score of 90.4%. The final approach to runway 06R was conducted from the southwest, with a heading of 51.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,258 feet above ground level (agl).
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on the runway at a speed of 126 knots, which was within the target range. The touchdown point was located 314 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, indicating a slight deviation from the ideal landing spot. However, the touchdown speed and rate were both considered good, with a firm touchdown rate of -353 feet per minute (fpm).
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 26°C and a wind speed of 2 knots from a direction of 0°. This resulted in a negligible crosswind and headwind, making the landing process smoother. The threshold height at 58 feet agl was slightly above the target, but the threshold speed of 134 knots was within the acceptable range.
The total landing distance of 1,470 meters was 42% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing roll. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, suggesting that the aircraft was well under control during the landing process. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft demonstrating good control and adherence to the target parameters.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values