Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Make small rudder corrections against a fixed point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline.
What happened: You drifted off the centreline on the approach.
Watch for: Runway centreline: tracked all the way to the threshold.
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: centreline 4.8° off, against a 1° limit.
At the 500 ft gate: centreline 4.8° off, against a 1° limit.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,310 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 342 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Dortmund Airport, the Airbus A321 began its journey on runway 24, taking off with a distance of 748 meters, which accounted for 54% of the runway. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 149 knots, with a local temperature of 13 degrees Celsius and a wind of 10 knots at 300 degrees. The crosswind component was 8 knots, while the headwind component was 5 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of Dortmund, it began its enroute climb 1 mile west of Holzwickede, rising from 1,563 feet above sea level to 36,754 feet in 22 minutes, covering a distance of 146 nautical miles. The climb rate was steady, with the aircraft reaching its cruising altitude efficiently. Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise 4 miles southeast of Hardheim, maintaining a steady altitude for 87 minutes while covering 667 nautical miles. The cruise phase was characterized by a stable flight path, with the aircraft consuming fuel efficiently.
As the aircraft approached its destination, Corfu Ioannis Kapodistrias International Airport, it began its enroute descent 12 miles northwest of Fier, Albania. The descent from 37,030 feet to 1,291 feet took 23 minutes, covering 121 nautical miles. The aircraft then lined up for a final approach to runway 34, touching down at a speed of 124 knots and a distance of 345 meters, which was within the acceptable limits. The total landing distance was 1,346 meters, accounting for 71% of the runway. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, completing its journey of 941 nautical miles in 144 minutes, with a total fuel consumption of 6,503 kilograms.
The final approach to runway 34 at LGKR Corfu Ioannis Kapodistrias International Airport from the south was executed with a heading of 344.0° at 4 nm and 1,277 ft above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a threshold height of 62 ft above ground level, which was above the target. However, the threshold speed of 127 kt was within the acceptable range, indicating a good control of the aircraft's descent.
As the aircraft touched down on the runway, the touchdown distance of 345 m was within the expected parameters, and the touchdown speed of 124 kt was also good. However, the touchdown rate of -486 fpm was hard, indicating a slight loss of control during the final stages of the landing. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with the aircraft centered on the runway. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 21°C and a wind of 14 kt at 260°, contributed to a relatively straightforward landing.
The total landing distance of 1,346 m was 71% of the runway length, indicating a good control of the aircraft's deceleration. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.2 m from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation during the final stages of the landing. Overall, the landing was scored 90.6%, reflecting a good performance with some minor deviations.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values