Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 12,322 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 2,206 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, your aircraft landing score of 82.3% shows that there is room for improvement in certain areas, but also highlights some positive aspects of your approach and landing.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is important to ensure a descent path that stays within the recommended glideslope limit and maintains the appropriate speed for a smooth landing. While your speed was well above target in this phase, there is an opportunity to focus on adjusting your descent path for future improvements.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is noted that the threshold height was excessively over target and the landing flare was very poor. These are critical elements to a successful landing and may require focused practice to refine your technique in these areas.
In the Touchdown Phase, it is encouraging to see that your touchdown rate was good despite a slightly higher speed than the target. However, the touchdown point being 753 ft beyond the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position 10 ft from the centerline indicate a need for more precision in your landing.
It is worth mentioning that landing with a 13 kn crosswind is a challenging feat, and you should be commended for successfully navigating this aspect of your landing.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, maintaining a very good runway alignment demonstrates your ability to control the aircraft effectively during the final stages of landing.
In conclusion, while there are areas that could be improved upon, your landing score of 82.3% is a solid foundation to build upon. With focused practice and attention to the specific aspects highlighted in this analysis, you can continue to refine your landing technique and strive for even greater success in future flights. Keep up the good work and continue to challenge yourself to improve with each landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values