Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 18 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 13,431 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 1,010 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing can be considered average to slightly below average in terms of proficiency.
In the Approach Phase, the descent path was below glideslope limit, indicating that the aircraft was descending too steeply. However, the heading alignment and speed were both excellent, which suggests that the pilot was able to maintain control of the aircraft in terms of direction and speed. The warning to take care not to stall implies that the pilot may have been flying too slowly during the approach.
During the Landing Phase, the threshold height was slightly too low, which could have resulted in a harder touchdown than desired. The landing flare was fair, indicating that the pilot was able to level the aircraft off just before touchdown to reduce the impact force.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was fair, meaning that the aircraft touched down with a moderate amount of force. The speed was on target, indicating that the pilot was able to maintain the appropriate landing speed. The touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone was a positive aspect of the landing, as it shows that the pilot was able to land within the designated area. However, the runway touchdown position being 2.9 m from the centerline suggests that there may have been some issues with alignment during touchdown.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was 12.7 m from the centerline, which indicates that the pilot may have had difficulty maintaining the aircraft on the centerline of the runway during the rollout.
Overall, while there were some positive aspects to the landing such as speed control and touchdown distance, there were also some areas for improvement such as descent path, threshold height, touchdown position, and runway alignment. With practice and additional training, the pilot could work on improving these areas to achieve a smoother and more precise landing in the future.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values