Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Shorten the long landing
Ground effect becomes significant below about one wingspan of height. A Cessna 172, with a 36 ft span, enters ground effect at flare height - the float it feels in the hold-off is ground effect arriving on cue. An A320, with a span around 117 ft, has been in ground effect since before the threshold and there is no sudden cushion to feel, only a gradual reduction in induced drag that lengthens any float you allow.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 8,535 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 1,786 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The 2.84 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
While your recent aircraft landing score of 62.9% may seem disappointing, it's important to remember that every landing is a valuable learning opportunity. Let's break down each phase of the landing and discuss ways to improve for next time.
During the Approach Phase, it was noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit and the speed was excessively high. To improve in this area, it's crucial to carefully monitor your altitude and airspeed throughout the approach, making gradual adjustments as needed to stay on track with the glidepath.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it was observed that the threshold height was significantly above the target and there was a very poor landing flare, as well as poor bank angle stability during landing. To address these issues, focus on achieving a stable approach and making smooth, controlled inputs during the flare and touchdown.
Finally, in the Touchdown Phase, it was noted that the touchdown rate was heavy, the speed was excessively high, and the touchdown point was well beyond the designated zone. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was off-center and there were multiple bounces upon touchdown. To improve in this area, work on maintaining proper speed control and aiming for a smoother touchdown within the designated zone.
Overall, while your recent landing may not have been perfect, it's important to view this as a valuable opportunity for growth. By identifying areas for improvement and implementing targeted practice, you can continue to enhance your skills and strive for more successful landings in the future. Keep up the hard work and stay focused on refining your technique – you've got this!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values