Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach angle
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 3,800 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the full 3,800 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 1,477 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, achieving an aircraft landing score of 86.9% is a great accomplishment, but there is still room for improvement in certain areas.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it's clear that there were some challenges with maintaining proper descent path and speed control. While the descent path was above the glideslope limit, it's important to work on correcting this to ensure a smoother approach in future landings. Additionally, being well above the speed target can impact the overall landing quality and safety.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's fantastic to see that the threshold height was good and the landing flare was excellent. These are both crucial elements in ensuring a successful landing. However, there is room for improvement with the touchdown point being slightly beyond the designated zone and the runway touchdown position being slightly off centerline.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate and speed were both on target which is commendable. This shows that the pilot has a good understanding of how to execute a safe and controlled landing.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was very good. This is essential for a smooth exit from the runway and indicates a strong level of control during the final stages of the landing process.
Overall, while there were some areas that could be improved upon, achieving a landing score of 86.9% is something to be proud of. By continuing to work on precision in descent path, speed control, and touchdown point accuracy, even better results can be achieved in future landings. Keep up the good work and strive for continual improvement in all phases of the landing process.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values