Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 15 stages, 14 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 152 m above the runway. The 305 m gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,594 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 653 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Airbus A330-900 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Munich Airport, EDDM. This process took 14 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft then departed from runway 08L, with a takeoff distance of 1,659 meters, which accounted for 42% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 157 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of Munich Airport, it began its enroute climb 1 mile north east of the airport. The climb took place from an altitude of 745 meters above sea level to 12,184 meters above sea level, an increase of 11,438.3 meters. This climb phase lasted for 20 minutes and covered a distance of 125 nautical miles. The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 18 degrees Celsius.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 2 miles south of Tettau, a town in Bavaria, Germany. This cruise phase lasted for 32 minutes and covered a distance of 441 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent 1 mile north of Roeroe, a town in Vaestra Goetaland County, Sweden. The descent took place from an altitude of 12,186 meters above sea level to 596 meters above sea level, a decrease of 11,589.3 meters. This descent phase lasted for 33 minutes and covered a distance of 150 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, it began its final approach to runway 19R from the north, heading 196.0 degrees at an altitude of 389.1 meters above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing took place on a runway with a length of 3,594 meters, and the threshold height was good. The threshold speed was also good at 137 knots. However, the touchdown point was 238 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was a little fast at 136 knots. The touchdown rate was firm at -1.7 meters per second. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was significantly misaligned by 28.1 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 20 degrees Celsius.
The total flight distance was 726 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 102 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 10,254 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A330-900 successfully landed at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a score of 85.0%. The aircraft approached the runway from the north, heading 196.0° at an altitude of 389.1 meters above ground level (agl) and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway.
The final approach to runway 19R was executed with good threshold height, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct altitude as it approached the runway. The threshold speed was also within the acceptable range at 137 knots, suggesting that the pilots maintained a stable and controlled approach.
However, the touchdown point was 238 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which may indicate that the pilots could have maintained a more precise control over the aircraft's descent. The touchdown speed of 136 knots was slightly faster than the ideal speed, which could have contributed to the slightly firm touchdown rate of -1.7 meters per second.
One of the notable issues with this landing was the significant misalignment of the runway touchdown position, which was 28.1 meters off the centerline. This could be attributed to a variety of factors, including pilot error, navigation system malfunctions, or external factors such as wind or turbulence.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 20°C. Overall, while the landing was successful, there were some areas for improvement, particularly in terms of maintaining a more precise control over the aircraft's descent and touchdown position.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values