Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,847 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 350 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 28 at ENZV Stavanger Airport, Sola, with a takeoff distance of 625 meters, which was 28% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 138 knots, and the local weather conditions were characterized by a temperature of 7°C, a wind speed of 14 knots at 279°, resulting in a 2-knot crosswind and a 14-knot headwind.
As the aircraft climbed, it started enroute climb 1 mile west of ENZV Stavanger Airport, Sola, and reached an altitude of 39,726 feet above sea level, an increase of 38,582 feet from the initial altitude of 1,144 feet. This climb took 15 minutes and covered 83 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise then began 55 miles southwest of Vestbygd, Norway, and lasted for 25 minutes, covering 198 nautical miles.
The enroute descent started 48 miles north of Hoorn, The Netherlands, and descended from 39,982 feet to 2,008 feet, a decrease of 37,974 feet in 18 minutes, covering 101 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered another enroute level cruise 1 mile southwest of Markenbinnen, The Netherlands, which lasted for 2 minutes and covered 7 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 18C at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol was made from the north, heading 183.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,081 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 18C, which had a length of 2,847 meters, was successful, with a good threshold height, threshold speed, and touchdown distance. The touchdown speed was a little fast at 114 knots, but the touchdown rate was firm at -338 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 9°C, a wind speed of 7 knots at 130°, resulting in a 5-knot crosswind and a 4-knot headwind. The total landing distance was 892 meters, which was 31% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good, and the taxiing to the parking from the runway took 1 minute, covering less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 396 nautical miles, taking 67 minutes, and the aircraft used 1,068 kilograms of fuel.
Aircraft C750 successfully landed on runway 18C at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, achieving a high score of 98.7%. The final approach was conducted from the north, heading 183.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,081 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft demonstrated good control and precision during the approach, ultimately landing safely on the runway.
The landing was characterized by a good threshold height, indicating that the aircraft was properly configured for landing. The threshold speed of 118 knots was also within acceptable limits, suggesting that the pilot had effectively managed the aircraft's descent and approach speed. However, the touchdown speed of 114 knots was slightly faster than desired, which may have resulted in a firmer touchdown rate.
The touchdown rate of -338 feet per minute (fpm) was firm, but not excessively so. This suggests that the pilot had effectively managed the aircraft's descent and touchdown, but may have been able to achieve a smoother touchdown with a slightly slower speed. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the pilot had maintained precise control of the aircraft during the final stages of the approach.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were relatively calm, with a temperature of 9°C and winds of 7 knots at 130°. The crosswind component was 5 knots, while the headwind component was 4 knots. These conditions were favorable for the landing, and the pilot was able to effectively manage the aircraft's approach and touchdown.
The total landing distance of 892 meters was 31% of the runway length, indicating that the pilot had effectively managed the aircraft's descent and touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was very good, suggesting that the pilot had maintained precise control of the aircraft during the rollout phase of the landing. Overall, the landing was a success, with the aircraft demonstrating good control and precision throughout the approach and touchdown phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values